# 1953 Twin Turbo Studebaker

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/1953-twin-turbo-studebaker/196860>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [April 15, 2008, 10:03pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/1953-twin-turbo-studebaker/196860 "2008-04-15T22:03:22Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zack01GC](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/a183cd/32.png) [@Zack01GC](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Zack01GC)\
**Post date:** [April 16, 2008, 6:37am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/1953-twin-turbo-studebaker/196860/3 "2008-04-16T06:37:53Z")

</div>

> [@STEVE(cky89) RAPED!](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/steve-cky89-raped/35827/116):
>
> cool car. I would have expected more power, though. It took forever to spin the rollers. Must still have top speed rear gears in it. Sounds like a 'glide in it, too.

It might have some really high gears, it says it was built for top speed.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/1953-twin-turbo-studebaker/196860)._