# 1993 240sx 30,000km \*Pics n Info\* 56k warning!

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/1993-240sx-30-000km-pics-n-info-56k-warning/127483>\
**Category:** SON240sx Automotive\
**Created:** [August 26, 2009, 12:13pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/1993-240sx-30-000km-pics-n-info-56k-warning/127483 "2009-08-26T12:13:32Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 55

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cal-SoY](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/91b2a8/32.png) [@Cal-SoY](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Cal-SoY)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2009, 9:25pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/1993-240sx-30-000km-pics-n-info-56k-warning/127483/55 "2009-08-27T21:25:47Z")

</div>

> [@STi rear seats?](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/sti-rear-seats/23738/4):
>
> meh, i’d take it for the shell and strip it down and get rid of all the oem crap. I don’t see anything special about it being OEM/low km other than a clean chassis. It’s honestly looking like most florida/california US based cars regardless of clicks.

Agreed. i’d make it a race car as fast as i could

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/1993-240sx-30-000km-pics-n-info-56k-warning/127483)._