# 1998 eclipse gsx automatic upgrade path

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/1998-eclipse-gsx-automatic-upgrade-path/190825
**Category:** PittSpeed Automotive
**Created:** [June 28, 2007, 12:52pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/1998-eclipse-gsx-automatic-upgrade-path/190825 "2007-06-28T12:52:36Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 32

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ssdragon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/3ab097/32.png) [@ssdragon](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ssdragon)
#### Post date: [July 3, 2007, 8:31am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/1998-eclipse-gsx-automatic-upgrade-path/190825/32 "2007-07-03T08:31:43Z")

</div>

> [@My 2007 USGP Photos](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-2007-usgp-photos/31102/17):
>
> I agree.
> 
> My car was probably in the area of ~530 at the crank, on 93 octane gas and a stock bottom end car with cams and probably every bolt on. Other people have dyno’d 500+whp on pump gas, but as you said, it becomes expensive. I feel as though on my setup, I maximized my use of airflow pretty well. If I wanted any more on pump gas, I would’ve had to change some internals around. This was all put through a 5-speed though, and you’re going to see more drivetrain losses through that auto.
> 
> Is it doable? Absolutely. But as I said earlier, I hope he has deep pockets.
> 
> I think a more reasonable option would be :
> 
> -build the auto tranny  
> -buy the flavor of the week 50 trim  
> -get a 6-bolt block if you ever develop any problems with the current motor  
> -make around 350 on pump gas hopefully, and enjoy a low 12 second car.
> 
> Just my .02 though.
> 
> Jesse

well, he bought the car last night. 1997 Red gsx automatic with only 50,000 miles on it so for like $7000. Lokks real clean for its age. If it only takes 350hp to get into the 12’s then im sure that would be fine. I thought it would take more power to get to low 12’s.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/1998-eclipse-gsx-automatic-upgrade-path/190825)._
