# 1999 Camaro  - $5000

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/1999-camaro-5000/243117
**Category:** Classifieds
**Created:** [March 27, 2009, 2:50pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/1999-camaro-5000/243117 "2009-03-27T14:50:00Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 27

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![SSmokinn\_SS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ec9cab/32.png) [@SSmokinn\_SS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SSmokinn_SS)
#### Post date: [April 9, 2009, 5:43am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/1999-camaro-5000/243117/27 "2009-04-09T05:43:21Z")

</div>

> [@Labour of Love 2006 - Sunday, Sept. 3](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/labour-of-love-2006-sunday-sept-3/16508/33):
>
> The size of the injectors and turbo dont mean that much considering the tune keeps it from pouring fuel down the motors throat when not at WOT
> 
> A force induced car tends to get better gas mileage (when not romping on it) because its more efficient and generally the car doesn’t have to work as hard to get going.
> 
> I thought my gas mileage was going to be horrible, because of the cams but they dident make to much of a differance
> 
> I’m seeing 4mpg more than I was last year even when romping on it because i dont have to keep my foot in it as long to get up to speed :rofl

weird…I get super shitty gas mileage with my big cam. To a full tank I lost over 70mpg’s.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/1999-camaro-5000/243117)._