# 2005 Mustang TT Kit

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2005-mustang-tt-kit/172000>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [January 27, 2005, 10:49am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2005-mustang-tt-kit/172000 "2005-01-27T10:49:38Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gray05](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/cc9497/32.png) [@Gray05](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Gray05)\
**Post date:** [January 27, 2005, 10:49am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2005-mustang-tt-kit/172000/1 "2005-01-27T10:49:38Z")

</div>

[http://www.ultimate-racing.com/Products/Ford-US-MustangGTTurboKit.shtml](http://www.ultimate-racing.com/Products/Ford-US-MustangGTTurboKit.shtml)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![YellowZ](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/edb3f5/32.png) [@YellowZ](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/YellowZ)\
**Post date:** [January 27, 2005, 11:00am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2005-mustang-tt-kit/172000/2 "2005-01-27T11:00:49Z")

</div>

Cool. :bigok:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bics56](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/47e85d/32.png) [@bics56](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bics56)\
**Post date:** [January 27, 2005, 12:37pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2005-mustang-tt-kit/172000/3 "2005-01-27T12:37:29Z")

</div>

Sweet, pretty good power gains for that weak stock motor(267rwhp).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![oneslowbowtie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/d78d45/32.png) [@oneslowbowtie](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/oneslowbowtie)\
**Post date:** [January 27, 2005, 12:49pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2005-mustang-tt-kit/172000/4 "2005-01-27T12:49:28Z")

</div>

those hp #'s are butt…for all that money and time you should see more hp & tq

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bics56](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/47e85d/32.png) [@bics56](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bics56)\
**Post date:** [January 27, 2005, 1:01pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2005-mustang-tt-kit/172000/5 "2005-01-27T13:01:46Z")

</div>

What does the LS1 TT setup put out?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![oneslowbowtie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/d78d45/32.png) [@oneslowbowtie](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/oneslowbowtie)\
**Post date:** [January 27, 2005, 1:03pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2005-mustang-tt-kit/172000/6 "2005-01-27T13:03:00Z")

</div>

> [@bics56](#):
>
> What does the LS1 TT setup put out?

I dont know , ask 2fnfast

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bics56](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/47e85d/32.png) [@bics56](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bics56)\
**Post date:** [January 27, 2005, 1:08pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2005-mustang-tt-kit/172000/7 "2005-01-27T13:08:02Z")

</div>

Well anyways a TT Mustang overall is still cool

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\
**Post date:** [January 27, 2005, 4:40pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2005-mustang-tt-kit/172000/8 "2005-01-27T16:40:34Z")

</div>

2fnfast is doin a single setup. 500-600hp

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\
**Post date:** [January 27, 2005, 4:41pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2005-mustang-tt-kit/172000/9 "2005-01-27T16:41:45Z")

</div>

> [@bics56](#):
>
> Sweet, pretty good power gains for that weak stock motor(267rwhp).

how do you its weak? its never been in any ford besides the 05 :rolleyes:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bics56](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/47e85d/32.png) [@bics56](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bics56)\
**Post date:** [January 27, 2005, 6:18pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2005-mustang-tt-kit/172000/10 "2005-01-27T18:18:42Z")

</div>

> [@SHAG](#):
>
> how do you its weak? its never been in any ford besides the 05 :rolleyes:

To me 267 RWHP isnt all that impressive. Anyways you know how I am I always got to cut on mustangs when they are in stock form(except the 03+ cobra)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BlkP42E](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/blkp42e/32/5938_2.png) [@BlkP42E](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BlkP42E)\
**Post date:** [January 27, 2005, 7:26pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2005-mustang-tt-kit/172000/11 "2005-01-27T19:26:14Z")

</div>

bandwith exceeded

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gray05](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/cc9497/32.png) [@Gray05](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Gray05)\
**Post date:** [January 28, 2005, 12:10am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2005-mustang-tt-kit/172000/12 "2005-01-28T00:10:36Z")

</div>

> [@bics56](#):
>
> Sweet, pretty good power gains for that weak stock motor(267rwhp).

yet still runs LS1 f-body times

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bics56](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/47e85d/32.png) [@bics56](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bics56)\
**Post date:** [January 28, 2005, 12:56pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2005-mustang-tt-kit/172000/13 "2005-01-28T12:56:52Z")

</div>

> [@Blue4](#):
>
> yet still runs LS1 f-body times

:weak: Whatever…every time I have seen has been high 13’s some in the 14’s and barely trap over 100 mph. your average f-body will run a very low 13 and trap over 106…some in the 108 range. So fire away :reloading Mr. stats and try to shoot my arguement down. Stock GT is still slow I would put a 6 speed LT1 against one and bet it would be close with equal drivers (the stang would probably win by a very small margin).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HaNnIBaL64](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/hannibal64/32/5954_2.png) [@HaNnIBaL64](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/HaNnIBaL64)\
**Post date:** [January 28, 2005, 12:59pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2005-mustang-tt-kit/172000/14 "2005-01-28T12:59:06Z")

</div>

> [@bics56](#):
>
> :weak: Whatever…every time I have seen has been high 13’s some in the 14’s and barely trap over 100 mph. your average f-body will run a very low 13 and trap over 106…some in the 108 range. So fire away :reloading Mr. stats and try to shoot my arguement down. Stock GT is still slow I would put a 6 speed LT1 against one and bet it would be close with equal drivers (the stang would probably win by a very small margin).

yeah thell that to my little na 4.6 cobra and then check with the 35 anniv ss i smoked

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bics56](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/47e85d/32.png) [@bics56](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bics56)\
**Post date:** [January 28, 2005, 1:02pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2005-mustang-tt-kit/172000/15 "2005-01-28T13:02:07Z")

</div>

> [@HaNnIBaL64](#):
>
> yeah thell that to my little na 4.6 cobra and then check with the 35 anniv ss i smoked

Driver can makes the biggest difference in the world… but a kill is a kill.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![smokeyburnouts](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/smokeyburnouts/32/5987_2.png) [@smokeyburnouts](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/smokeyburnouts)\
**Post date:** [January 28, 2005, 1:02pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2005-mustang-tt-kit/172000/16 "2005-01-28T13:02:10Z")

</div>

🍪💤

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HaNnIBaL64](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/hannibal64/32/5954_2.png) [@HaNnIBaL64](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/HaNnIBaL64)\
**Post date:** [January 28, 2005, 1:03pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2005-mustang-tt-kit/172000/17 "2005-01-28T13:03:14Z")

</div>

> [@bics56](#):
>
> Driver can makes the biggest difference in the world… but a kill is a kill.

stick \> auto

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bics56](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/47e85d/32.png) [@bics56](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bics56)\
**Post date:** [January 28, 2005, 1:14pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2005-mustang-tt-kit/172000/18 "2005-01-28T13:14:24Z")

</div>

> [@HaNnIBaL64](#):
>
> stick \> auto

I agree mostly…but at the drag strip 9 out of ten times auto owns stick. From a roll stick owns auto. Overall stick is more fun and takes more skill…anyways offtopic now…a little back ontopic any amerian muscle with TT fuckin rips!!!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gray05](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/cc9497/32.png) [@Gray05](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Gray05)\
**Post date:** [January 28, 2005, 1:17pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2005-mustang-tt-kit/172000/19 "2005-01-28T13:17:12Z")

</div>

umm… a lot of places have tested the new 05 GT 5spd at 13.3

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bics56](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/47e85d/32.png) [@bics56](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bics56)\
**Post date:** [January 28, 2005, 1:24pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2005-mustang-tt-kit/172000/20 "2005-01-28T13:24:56Z")

</div>

Don’t get me wrong I do think Ford did a good job on the new stang. With wheels they look sick.

[Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2005-mustang-tt-kit/172000.md?page=2)
