# 2006 ASC dodge Viper Pics
**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-asc-dodge-viper-pics/9862
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive
**Created:** [March 26, 2006, 3:03pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-asc-dodge-viper-pics/9862 "2006-03-26T15:03:00Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@Viper966](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Viper966)
#### Post date: [March 26, 2006, 3:03pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-asc-dodge-viper-pics/9862/1 "2006-03-26T15:03:00Z")
:bowdown:
0-60: 3.5 seconds
615hp
Weight: 3325 lbs
HP/Weight: 5.4 lbs per hp
(from ASC Press Release) A “snake” with an all-new skin—and ultimate display of the production merits of ASC’s patent-pending OmniCarbon™ process–the Diamondback Viper is super-light and super-fast. It’s fitting that ASC, which helped the Chrysler Group bring the new Dodge Viper SRT10 coupe to life, would, with the aid of McLaren Performance Technologies, show how the Viper coupe might be taken to an all-new level of “extreme.” The 615hp Diamondback Viper features a carbon
fiber roof, deck lid, rockers, fascia inserts, body trim and a massive OmniCarbon™ hood that shows off ten unique trumpeted air intakes, with individual port throttles, peeking through—a McLaren Performance Technologies feature reminiscent of McLaren Can-Am engines of the past. The hood also shows off ASC’s expertise in compression-molded carbon fiber, both painted and woven. It’s displayed beautifully, with a broad, clearcoated racing stripe down the Artic White-painted expanse, subtly outlined by “Viper Blue” and “McLaren Red” pinstripes. In all, ASC removed about 85 lbs. of weight from the vehicle—including cutting the weight of the hood by nearly half versus the production model. Taken together with the powertrain modifications by McLaren Performance Technologies, the power-to-weight ratio was increased, resulting in an estimated increase in 0-60 mph time of 3.5 seconds. And, importantly, ASC’s OmniCarbon™ isn’t just light and nice to look at: ASC has reduced cycle times in the process by 80 percent versus conventional molding methods, and is confident its process meets OEM production specifications.
---
### Author:  [@66impalass](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/66impalass)
#### Post date: [March 26, 2006, 3:04pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-asc-dodge-viper-pics/9862/2 "2006-03-26T15:04:34Z")
its ok in person, that was at the detroit autoshow, the model standing next to it was hotter than it was, but i am not a viper fan
---
### Author:  [@neurokinetik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/neurokinetik)
#### Post date: [March 26, 2006, 3:05pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-asc-dodge-viper-pics/9862/3 "2006-03-26T15:05:14Z")
They had that car in Detroit this year… ASC had a nice display with some other interesting cars, too.
---
### Author:  [@Twizted](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Twizted)
#### Post date: [March 26, 2006, 3:11pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-asc-dodge-viper-pics/9862/4 "2006-03-26T15:11:03Z")
damn thats hott
---
### Author:  [@The\_Russian](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/The_Russian)
#### Post date: [March 26, 2006, 3:16pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-asc-dodge-viper-pics/9862/5 "2006-03-26T15:16:29Z")
like the V stacks, saw it at detroit, i had the side exhaust, everyone i know who has that says its a bitch when you burn your leg on the sills, just have rear exit exhaust and make it simple
---
### Author:  [@AlbinoMonkeyRat](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/AlbinoMonkeyRat)
#### Post date: [March 26, 2006, 3:28pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-asc-dodge-viper-pics/9862/6 "2006-03-26T15:28:19Z")
I like the shape of it, but it’s just too busy with all the black patches.
---
### Author:  [@MikeRi24](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/MikeRi24)
#### Post date: [March 26, 2006, 4:11pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-asc-dodge-viper-pics/9862/7 "2006-03-26T16:11:33Z")
holy jesus thats hot!
---
### Author:  [@JaysGreenLX](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JaysGreenLX)
#### Post date: [March 26, 2006, 5:57pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-asc-dodge-viper-pics/9862/8 "2006-03-26T17:57:33Z")
I’d prefer it all in one color.
---
### Author:  [@AlbinoMonkeyRat](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/AlbinoMonkeyRat)
#### Post date: [March 26, 2006, 6:51pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-asc-dodge-viper-pics/9862/9 "2006-03-26T18:51:03Z")
> [@JaysGreenLX](#):
>
> I’d prefer it all in one color.
🙂
---
### Author:  [@rj-92](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/rj-92)
#### Post date: [March 26, 2006, 7:18pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-asc-dodge-viper-pics/9862/10 "2006-03-26T19:18:49Z")
I’m not really into Vipers but I like it.
---
### Author:  [@ezfd](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ezfd)
#### Post date: [March 26, 2006, 8:25pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-asc-dodge-viper-pics/9862/11 "2006-03-26T20:25:45Z")
it looks great, i really do like the velocity stacks, they bring a really cool aspect of tech to the viper. t up
---
### Author:  [@psphinx81](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/psphinx81)
#### Post date: [March 27, 2006, 5:07am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-asc-dodge-viper-pics/9862/12 "2006-03-27T05:07:31Z")
holy hotness :tup:
---
### Author:  [@BLKGSR](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BLKGSR)
#### Post date: [March 27, 2006, 5:29am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-asc-dodge-viper-pics/9862/13 "2006-03-27T05:29:20Z")
> [@JaysGreenLX](#):
>
> I’d prefer it all in one color.
Yep
---
### Author:  [@taurusho](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/taurusho)
#### Post date: [March 27, 2006, 5:41am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-asc-dodge-viper-pics/9862/14 "2006-03-27T05:41:31Z")
I dig the contrasting colors. It definitely is hot.
---
### Author:  [@TgDn32](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/TgDn32)
#### Post date: [March 27, 2006, 7:31am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-asc-dodge-viper-pics/9862/15 "2006-03-27T07:31:01Z")
At first, I saw only the drawing and thought :bloated:
Then I saw the car and thought:pimp:
---
### Author:  [@Juan](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Juan)
#### Post date: [March 27, 2006, 7:35am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-asc-dodge-viper-pics/9862/16 "2006-03-27T07:35:54Z")
meh
---
### Author:  [@TrueBlue](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/TrueBlue)
#### Post date: [March 27, 2006, 7:47am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-asc-dodge-viper-pics/9862/17 "2006-03-27T07:47:05Z")
does it come with the two tubes of viper blue/mclaren red tennis balls to stick in those velo stacks? 😉
paint it all black and yeah, I’m a fan :tup:
---
### Author:  [@Daddie](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Daddie)
#### Post date: [March 27, 2006, 7:47am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-asc-dodge-viper-pics/9862/18 "2006-03-27T07:47:47Z")
I’d hit it.
---
### Author:  [@focusinprogress](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/focusinprogress)
#### Post date: [March 27, 2006, 10:05am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-asc-dodge-viper-pics/9862/19 "2006-03-27T10:05:40Z")
if the CF was painted car color, i would love it. but im sick of all the car companies lately making half the car CF, i had the same problem with the new skyline concept. too much CF IS existant and a bad thing. other than that its pretty hot
---
### Author:  [@j\_espo1](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/j_espo1)
#### Post date: [March 27, 2006, 10:19am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-asc-dodge-viper-pics/9862/20 "2006-03-27T10:19:57Z")
fookin HOT