# 2006 Camaro concept to be introduced this january
**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-camaro-concept-to-be-introduced-this-january/176169
**Category:** PittSpeed Automotive
**Created:** [August 7, 2005, 11:41am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-camaro-concept-to-be-introduced-this-january/176169 "2005-08-07T11:41:13Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@Slim\_06\_F-150](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Slim_06_F-150)
#### Post date: [August 7, 2005, 11:41am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-camaro-concept-to-be-introduced-this-january/176169/1 "2005-08-07T11:41:13Z")
[http://www.srtforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=166651](http://www.srtforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=166651)
---
### Author:  [@The1SloR\_T](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/The1SloR_T)
#### Post date: [August 7, 2005, 12:37pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-camaro-concept-to-be-introduced-this-january/176169/2 "2005-08-07T12:37:48Z")
i dont know weather to love or hate the concept…
here it is!
---
### Author:  [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)
#### Post date: [August 7, 2005, 12:59pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-camaro-concept-to-be-introduced-this-january/176169/3 "2005-08-07T12:59:18Z")
leave it to GM to fuck up shit
---
### Author:  [@ritalin](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ritalin)
#### Post date: [August 7, 2005, 1:24pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-camaro-concept-to-be-introduced-this-january/176169/4 "2005-08-07T13:24:05Z")
I kinda actually like the body on this one. Now if it comes with something like even an ls2/6/7 i’d start putting some shit together today. Idk though they always manage to water crap down.
---
### Author:  [@Slim\_06\_F-150](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Slim_06_F-150)
#### Post date: [August 7, 2005, 1:26pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-camaro-concept-to-be-introduced-this-january/176169/5 "2005-08-07T13:26:45Z")
that black concept is hottness
---
### Author:  [@Silver\_SS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Silver_SS)
#### Post date: [August 7, 2005, 1:27pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-camaro-concept-to-be-introduced-this-january/176169/6 "2005-08-07T13:27:56Z")
it’s OK…
---
### Author:  [@ritalin](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ritalin)
#### Post date: [August 7, 2005, 1:31pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-camaro-concept-to-be-introduced-this-january/176169/7 "2005-08-07T13:31:51Z")
It does need something other than torq thrust knock offs. :greddy:
---
### Author:  [@eurodad](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/eurodad)
#### Post date: [August 7, 2005, 1:37pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-camaro-concept-to-be-introduced-this-january/176169/8 "2005-08-07T13:37:16Z")
that should have been the vette
---
### Author:  [@Turbo\_Silverado](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Turbo_Silverado)
#### Post date: [August 7, 2005, 2:47pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-camaro-concept-to-be-introduced-this-january/176169/9 "2005-08-07T14:47:38Z")
they should have it for 2007…40th anniv.
---
### Author:  [@Silver\_SS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Silver_SS)
#### Post date: [August 7, 2005, 2:57pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-camaro-concept-to-be-introduced-this-january/176169/10 "2005-08-07T14:57:05Z")
the rear end resembles a 70 t0 73 with the tail lights. fuck make it look more like a 69 or something
---
### Author:  [@MONTE\_SS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/MONTE_SS)
#### Post date: [August 7, 2005, 4:03pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-camaro-concept-to-be-introduced-this-january/176169/11 "2005-08-07T16:03:34Z")
front fenders look just as the vette does! GET A NEW IDEA!
---
### Author:  [@bgblockelcamino](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bgblockelcamino)
#### Post date: [August 7, 2005, 8:04pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-camaro-concept-to-be-introduced-this-january/176169/12 "2005-08-07T20:04:08Z")
:dunno: I like it, but leave it to GM to ruin that car.
---
### Author:  [@Gray05](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Gray05)
#### Post date: [August 7, 2005, 8:07pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-camaro-concept-to-be-introduced-this-january/176169/13 "2005-08-07T20:07:37Z")
wow, that “Camaro” looks an awful lot like an Alfa Romeo
---
### Author:  [@smokeyburnouts](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/smokeyburnouts)
#### Post date: [August 8, 2005, 5:23am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-camaro-concept-to-be-introduced-this-january/176169/14 "2005-08-08T05:23:53Z")
> [@ritalin](#):
>
> It does need something other than torq thrust knock offs. :greddy:
those r Boyd Coddington Smoothie II’s :rolleyes:
---
### Author:  [@Turbo\_Silverado](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Turbo_Silverado)
#### Post date: [August 8, 2005, 5:34am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-camaro-concept-to-be-introduced-this-january/176169/15 "2005-08-08T05:34:00Z")
ya…sad to say…but this is prob. one of the worst threads about the comback of the camaro
:1320:
---
### Author:  [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)
#### Post date: [August 8, 2005, 7:10am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-camaro-concept-to-be-introduced-this-january/176169/16 "2005-08-08T07:10:42Z")
the next camaro will be as stupid as the ones they cancelled.
teh mustang can never lose, why would GM even try?
---
### Author:  [@Turbo\_Silverado](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Turbo_Silverado)
#### Post date: [August 8, 2005, 7:13am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-camaro-concept-to-be-introduced-this-january/176169/17 "2005-08-08T07:13:05Z")
> [@77rednecktruck](#):
>
> the next camaro will be as stupid as the ones they cancelled.
>
> teh mustang can never lose, why would GM even try?
ya…thats why the camaros they cancelled owned all Mustangs
---
### Author:  [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)
#### Post date: [August 8, 2005, 7:18am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-camaro-concept-to-be-introduced-this-january/176169/18 "2005-08-08T07:18:07Z")
> [@00BlackSS](#):
>
> ya…thats why the camaros they cancelled owned all Mustangs
they why were they cancelled?
if it was a good car, it would still be produced. plain and simple, the camaro was a nice engine with an extremely shitty car around it. 98% of the population wants a nice car, not a fast hunk of shit, performance is not everything.
---
### Author:  [@Turbo\_Silverado](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Turbo_Silverado)
#### Post date: [August 8, 2005, 7:22am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-camaro-concept-to-be-introduced-this-january/176169/19 "2005-08-08T07:22:35Z")
> [@77rednecktruck](#):
>
> they why were they cancelled?
>
> if it was a good car, it would still be produced. plain and simple, the camaro was a nice engine with an extremely shitty car around it. 98% of the population wants a nice car, not a fast hunk of shit, performance is not everything.
ya…b/c it didnt have the sales numbers of the mustang…listen we talked about this on a stang site…most sales are with those shitty v6 versions…every blonde chick wants on…and every wigger that wants a GT cant afford it soo buys the v6 and trys to make it like the GT.
What is soo Shitty about my car…tell me please…the suspenison, the interior, the motor, the tranny, the rear end, what is it…please tell me
one thing that is junk is the stock 10 bolt
---
### Author:  [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)
#### Post date: [August 8, 2005, 8:26am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-camaro-concept-to-be-introduced-this-january/176169/20 "2005-08-08T08:26:25Z")
> [@00BlackSS](#):
>
> ya…b/c it didnt have the sales numbers of the mustang…listen we talked about this on a stang site…most sales are with those shitty v6 versions…every blonde chick wants on…and every wigger that wants a GT cant afford it soo buys the v6 and trys to make it like the GT.
>
> What is soo Shitty about my car…tell me please…the suspenison, the interior, the motor, the tranny, the rear end, what is it…please tell me
>
> one thing that is junk is the stock 10 bolt
compared to a same year mustang, the camaro feels like a cheap slut compared to a mustang. the knobs in the interior feel shitty, the seats aren’t that comfortable, the whole interior is shitty. I will give the camaro it’s engine, it is nice. But for the price, the mustang is 10x the car a camaro is. the camaro was 3 years late in the beginning and has been playing catchup ever since.
I agree the sales are more for the 6cyl, but you have to do what the customer wants, and GM is too fucking stupid to do this.
[Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2006-camaro-concept-to-be-introduced-this-january/176169.md?page=2)