# 2007 ferrari

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2007-ferrari/177283>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [September 26, 2005, 2:49pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2007-ferrari/177283 "2005-09-26T14:49:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 18\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gray05](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/cc9497/32.png) [@Gray05](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Gray05)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2005, 5:42am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2007-ferrari/177283/21 "2005-09-28T05:42:44Z")

</div>

> [@JackdUp](#):
>
> Disclaimer: This isn’t flaming, just an honest opinion of two really nice cars, of which I’d take either one (for different reasons).
> 
> Ferrari:
> 
> Pros: The most incredible howling exhaust note imaginable, handles well and goes like hell.  
> Cons: Mechanically finicky, precise shifting required, expensive x10 for everything.
> 
> Vette:
> 
> Pros: Inexpensive, powerful and deep v8 exhaust note, supercar performance, robust platform, reliable, not a Ferrari.  
> Cons: Not a Ferrari.
> 
> * * *
> 
> That being said, all the supercars appear to be going toward the same basic design. The days of gaudy/flashy body lines are in remission. The NSX, Viper, Vette, Maserati as well as the Ferrari pictured above all look quite similar to each other. Even Lambos are starting to look like this same basic design and shed the outlandish wing/high body lines.

everything Ferrari makes is immaculate. but the new Z06 still will make them look like it’s bitch on the race track 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ferrari](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/82dd89/32.png) [@ferrari](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ferrari)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2005, 12:00pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2007-ferrari/177283/22 "2005-09-28T12:00:15Z")

</div>

> [@Gray05](#):
>
> everything Ferrari makes is immaculate. but the new Z06 still will make them look like it’s bitch on the race track 🙂

enzo? F40? F50? even the F430 would be a damn good race.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gray05](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/cc9497/32.png) [@Gray05](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Gray05)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2005, 2:10pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2007-ferrari/177283/23 "2005-09-28T14:10:23Z")

</div>

> [@ferrari](#):
>
> enzo? F40? F50? even the F430 would be a damn good race.

I think only the Enzo would give the Z06 a run

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2005, 3:04pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2007-ferrari/177283/24 "2005-09-28T15:04:23Z")

</div>

Mustangs \> \*

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ferrari](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/82dd89/32.png) [@ferrari](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ferrari)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2005, 3:05pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2007-ferrari/177283/25 "2005-09-28T15:05:15Z")

</div>

Enzo wouldnt just give it a run, it would crush it. R&T clocked the new Z06 and 4.2s to 60mph and 12.3 quarter mile. enzo is about a second faster in both.

F40 and F50 are about the same handling and acceleration-wise, and they’re both pretty comparable to the Z06, if not a little faster in a straight line. specs for the F40 (with ~40 less hp than the F50) are 3.8s 0-60 and 11.8s quarter mile. i know the z06 is probably a little faster than what R&T clocked because i’ve seen lower times, but i’d say they’re all pretty comparable. either way…i’d take any one of them in a heartbeat.

and the F430 is 3.5 0-60 and 11.7s quarter mile. pretty damn fast.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gray05](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/cc9497/32.png) [@Gray05](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Gray05)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2005, 3:09pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2007-ferrari/177283/26 "2005-09-28T15:09:01Z")

</div>

> [@ferrari](#):
>
> Enzo wouldnt just give it a run, it would crush it. R&T clocked the new Z06 and 4.2s to 60mph and 12.3 quarter mile. enzo is about a second faster in both.
> 
> F40 and F50 are about the same handling and acceleration-wise, and they’re both pretty comparable to the Z06, if not a little faster in a straight line. specs for the F40 (with ~40 less hp than the F50) are 3.8s 0-60 and 11.8s quarter mile. i know the z06 is probably a little faster than what R&T clocked because i’ve seen lower times, but i’d say they’re all pretty comparable. either way…i’d take any one of them in a heartbeat.
> 
> and the F430 is 3.5 0-60 and 11.7s quarter mile. pretty damn fast.

you got your numbers wrong.

c&d ran the Z06 to an 11.7 @ 125mph with the stock runflats on.

see this thread  
[http://www.pittspeed.com/forums/showthread.php?t=18629](http://www.pittspeed.com/forums/showthread.php?t=18629)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ferrari](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/82dd89/32.png) [@ferrari](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ferrari)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2005, 3:13pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2007-ferrari/177283/27 "2005-09-28T15:13:54Z")

</div>

yeah like i said those are the R&T numbers…some of the other magazines have better ones

i really wouldnt mind seeing an enzo,f40,f50, f430, and z06 battle it out on the track. anyone feel like buying them and racing at beaverun?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ZackG](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/ce7236/32.png) [@ZackG](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ZackG)\
**Post date:** [October 3, 2005, 6:51pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2007-ferrari/177283/28 "2005-10-03T18:51:01Z")

</div>

ha i know this is alittle late but its aerodynamics with the rear body of the car… high pressure and low pressure (i guess they want to squeeze everything out)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ogfeez](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/eb9ed0/32.png) [@ogfeez](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ogfeez)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2005, 1:07pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2007-ferrari/177283/29 "2005-10-21T13:07:27Z")

</div>

watch Le Mans Series Races, 2 championships in a row, Ferrari Left the season early because of i think about 7 straight embarrassing defeats by the Corvette team.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jinxxycat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/71c47a/32.png) [@jinxxycat](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/jinxxycat)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2005, 1:34pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2007-ferrari/177283/30 "2005-10-24T13:34:27Z")

</div>

Was at the Wynn Hotel/Casino out in Vegas this weekend. They have a Ferrari Dealership IN the casino/hotel. :blue: They had a lovely little Red Enzo that got me all hot and bothered. The “Ferrari Bar” in there had a carbon fiber bar top 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gray05](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/cc9497/32.png) [@Gray05](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Gray05)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2005, 4:07pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2007-ferrari/177283/31 "2005-10-24T16:07:42Z")

</div>

> [@ogfeez](#):
>
> watch Le Mans Series Races, 2 championships in a row, Ferrari Left the season early because of i think about 7 straight embarrassing defeats by the Corvette team.

Past few years the Corvette has been pretty much superior to Ferraris, whether its the base model or the Z06

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ferrari](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/82dd89/32.png) [@ferrari](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ferrari)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2005, 7:06pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2007-ferrari/177283/32 "2005-10-24T19:06:02Z")

</div>

> [@Gray05](#):
>
> Past few years the Corvette has been pretty much superior to Ferraris, whether its the base model or the Z06

:jerkit: way to state that without backing it up with any kind of evidence

ferrari \> corvette in almost all aspects of performance. excluding the Z06, corvette has a better price and probably better gas mileage but thats about it. and z06 vs enzo…isn’t even a competition.

/thread

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![imported\_showtime](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/51bf81/32.png) [@imported\_showtime](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/imported_showtime)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2005, 5:21am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2007-ferrari/177283/33 "2005-10-25T05:21:46Z")

</div>

Bugatti 16.4 = :bigthumb:

![http://www.rsportscars.com/foto/10/veyron06_10.jpg](http://www.rsportscars.com/foto/10/veyron06_10.jpg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![imported\_showtime](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/51bf81/32.png) [@imported\_showtime](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/imported_showtime)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2005, 5:23am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2007-ferrari/177283/34 "2005-10-25T05:23:58Z")

</div>

> [@Gray05](#):
>
> Past few years the Corvette has been pretty much superior to Ferraris, whether its the base model or the Z06

he’s serious too… 🤣 🤣 🤣

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![smokeyburnouts](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/smokeyburnouts/32/5987_2.png) [@smokeyburnouts](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/smokeyburnouts)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2005, 10:31am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2007-ferrari/177283/35 "2005-11-08T10:31:07Z")

</div>

ya, u guys know that ive got a pretty big vette bias but i cant say that the vette is superior to ferraris. some, maybe but not all. like stated before take the top of the line vette (z06) against top of th line ferrari (enzo) and its total domination. i’d take an f430 or even f360 over the c6Z06. ferraris r the most beautiful cars made, and vettes just arent in the same league. if u wanna go dollar value, then ya the vette is tops. both cars get props, but not really gonna accomplish anything by comparing the two

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ogfeez](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/eb9ed0/32.png) [@ogfeez](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ogfeez)\
**Post date:** [November 11, 2005, 12:01pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2007-ferrari/177283/36 "2005-11-11T12:01:04Z")

</div>

enzo… Corvette z06? not even in the same ball park, we’re talkin apples and oranges. enzo doesn’t even come with air conditioning, it was made almost absolutely for race purposes, and also for billionaires who get bloated checks and have no real reason for buying enzo’s but for status purposes. But i wouldn’t mind having an enzo for picking up chicks either. oh well guess i just contradicted my beliefs a little, i’ll live

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ferrari](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/82dd89/32.png) [@ferrari](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ferrari)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2005, 8:08pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2007-ferrari/177283/37 "2005-11-12T20:08:10Z")

</div>

> [@ogfeez](#):
>
> enzo… Corvette z06? not even in the same ball park, we’re talkin apples and oranges. enzo doesn’t even come with air conditioning

STFU n00b!

:blue:

but yeah i agree it’s no comparison.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DC300M01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/58956e/32.png) [@DC300M01](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/DC300M01)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2005, 10:45pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2007-ferrari/177283/38 "2005-11-12T22:45:03Z")

</div>

[McLaren F1](http://www.siliconvalleyautogroup.com/marques_stock/mclaren_1890/photo_page.html)

![http://www.siliconvalleyautogroup.com/marques_stock/mclaren_1890/photo_3.jpg](http://www.siliconvalleyautogroup.com/marques_stock/mclaren_1890/photo_3.jpg)

I love the center driving position…

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2007-ferrari/177283.md?page=1)
