# 2008 College Football thread **URL:** \ **Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\ **Created:** [July 30, 2008, 9:40pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2008-college-football-thread/198802 "2008-07-30T21:40:27Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 105
**Author:** ![Hycomp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/d6d6ee/32.png) [@Hycomp](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Hycomp)\ **Post date:** [November 4, 2008, 9:35am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2008-college-football-thread/198802/105 "2008-11-04T09:35:41Z")
> [@SOLD](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/sold/38566/13): > > 1. i hate the bcs and it needs to be exposed. > > oklahoma lost to the team that was #1 at the time (texas) who just lost to the current #2 team (texas tech) … who plays oklahoma in two weeks… > > just cause you step in the ring doesnt mean you can box. > > oklahoma lost to the team that was #1 at the time (texas) who just lost to the current #2 team (texas tech) … who plays oklahoma in two weeks… > > just cause you step in the ring doesnt mean you can box. At least you got the part about the BCS correct. Oklahoma lost to #5 Texas. Oklahoma was #1 and in the driver’s seat when they blew it. If Texas had ran the table and been at #1 at the end of the season Oklahoma would have an argument for being in the #2 slot. If TTech runs the table and finishes #1, Texas would have an argument (assuming they win out). One of these three teams could have the best one-loss argument at seasons end as I previously mentioned a few posts back. All the polls during the season just make for good arguments and really are pointless. Also, in the whole strength of schedule argument, is it better for a team to play 11 turds and the #1 team for a final game as opposed to playing 3-4 top 25ish teams? That seems to be what some think. Also, TTech has played 2 1AA teams this season. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2008-college-football-thread/198802)._