# 2008 Pontiac GTO

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2008-pontiac-gto/176098>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [August 3, 2005, 5:12pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2008-pontiac-gto/176098 "2005-08-03T17:12:28Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gray05](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/cc9497/32.png) [@Gray05](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Gray05)\
**Post date:** [August 3, 2005, 5:12pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2008-pontiac-gto/176098/1 "2005-08-03T17:12:28Z")

</div>

[http://www.autoweek.com/news.cms?newsId=102907](http://www.autoweek.com/news.cms?newsId=102907)

I hope thats a far off rendition

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![smokeyburnouts](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/smokeyburnouts/32/5987_2.png) [@smokeyburnouts](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/smokeyburnouts)\
**Post date:** [August 3, 2005, 7:13pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2008-pontiac-gto/176098/2 "2005-08-03T19:13:41Z")

</div>

yours \> that x a million…looks atleast

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BlackZ28](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/blackz28/32/5932_2.png) [@BlackZ28](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BlackZ28)\
**Post date:** [August 3, 2005, 7:41pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2008-pontiac-gto/176098/3 "2005-08-03T19:41:16Z")

</div>

that kinda looks like a concept i saw several years ago… was supposed to be the current GTO

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![whitey](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/whitey/32/5911_2.png) [@whitey](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/whitey)\
**Post date:** [August 3, 2005, 7:43pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2008-pontiac-gto/176098/4 "2005-08-03T19:43:12Z")

</div>

so they make it look less like a Grand Am now? cool.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BlkP42E](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/blkp42e/32/5938_2.png) [@BlkP42E](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BlkP42E)\
**Post date:** [August 3, 2005, 8:34pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2008-pontiac-gto/176098/5 "2005-08-03T20:34:38Z")

</div>

yeah. now it looks like a galant

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ritalin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/74df32/32.png) [@ritalin](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ritalin)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2005, 4:21am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2008-pontiac-gto/176098/6 "2005-08-04T04:21:13Z")

</div>

Looks like a fucking sunbird. 🤣

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![smokeyburnouts](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/smokeyburnouts/32/5987_2.png) [@smokeyburnouts](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/smokeyburnouts)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2005, 5:24am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2008-pontiac-gto/176098/7 "2005-08-04T05:24:31Z")

</div>

> [@BlkP42E](#):
>
> yeah. now it looks like a galant

ya it really does in the front…haha

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ritalin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/74df32/32.png) [@ritalin](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ritalin)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2005, 5:50am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2008-pontiac-gto/176098/8 "2005-08-04T05:50:03Z")

</div>

Not really all that related but a friend at work tells me that 2008 is the supposed target year for the return of the camaro. He said something about basing it off the cts-v chassis with something similar to an LS7. :mullet:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2005, 6:23am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2008-pontiac-gto/176098/9 "2005-08-04T06:23:19Z")

</div>

i can’t wait till Pontiac goes the way of Oldsmobile.

I don’t know which gto is worse. the one now is boring as fuck(looks wise) and this new one is ugly, but at least it has a little bit of styling.

the current gto would be so much better if it wasn’t called a gto.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SVshine03](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/258eb7/32.png) [@SVshine03](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SVshine03)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2005, 10:24am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2008-pontiac-gto/176098/10 "2005-08-04T10:24:16Z")

</div>

Still not impressed

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Converted2LSX](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/converted2lsx/32/5962_2.png) [@Converted2LSX](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Converted2LSX)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2005, 10:35am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2008-pontiac-gto/176098/11 "2005-08-04T10:35:13Z")

</div>

> [@SVshine03](#):
>
> Still not impressed

x 635674567457845678484678476758

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ShalerPunk](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shalerpunk/32/5976_2.png) [@ShalerPunk](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ShalerPunk)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2005, 11:07am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2008-pontiac-gto/176098/12 "2005-08-04T11:07:09Z")

</div>

> [@Autoweek.com](#):
>
> One more tidbit: It’s not shown here, but we hear GM is considering doing this GTO as a four-door coupe, using rear-hinged rear-access doors without visible handles.

hahaha…

yeah, those look so hot on the Saturn Ion + Mazda RX8…

:jerkit:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SVshine03](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/258eb7/32.png) [@SVshine03](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SVshine03)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2005, 11:49am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2008-pontiac-gto/176098/13 "2005-08-04T11:49:37Z")

</div>

> [@ShalerPunk](#):
>
> hahaha…
> 
> yeah, those look so hot on the Saturn Ion + Mazda RX8…
> 
> :jerkit:

Yeah thats just ridiculous…If they want to do something good with the GTO go back to the old style not this pansy lets make it look like everyother ghetto fabulous car bs

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2005, 12:59pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2008-pontiac-gto/176098/14 "2005-08-04T12:59:30Z")

</div>

> [@SVshine03](#):
>
> Yeah thats just ridiculous…If they want to do something good with the GTO go back to the old style not this pansy lets make it look like everyother ghetto fabulous car bs

the older cars all looked similar also.

I wish these manufacturers would think of new names instead of disgracing the old names though. IMO

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SVshine03](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/258eb7/32.png) [@SVshine03](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SVshine03)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2005, 1:10pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2008-pontiac-gto/176098/15 "2005-08-04T13:10:07Z")

</div>

> [@77rednecktruck](#):
>
> the older cars all looked similar also.
> 
> I wish these manufacturers would think of new names instead of disgracing the old names though. IMO

I agree…Don’t say you are bring back a car then have it turn out like the GTO or the charger now that was a disgrace - -

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gray05](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/cc9497/32.png) [@Gray05](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Gray05)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2005, 8:32pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2008-pontiac-gto/176098/16 "2005-08-04T20:32:11Z")

</div>

> [@whitey](#):
>
> so they make it look less like a Grand Am now? cool.

thats Pontiac’s thing, to look uniform… you know VW does the same thing too

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gray05](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/cc9497/32.png) [@Gray05](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Gray05)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2005, 8:33pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2008-pontiac-gto/176098/17 "2005-08-04T20:33:16Z")

</div>

> [@ritalin](#):
>
> Not really all that related but a friend at work tells me that 2008 is the supposed target year for the return of the camaro. He said something about basing it off the cts-v chassis with something similar to an LS7. :mullet:

GTO is pretty much based off the CTS chassis as is… just a “lite” version of it, it’s just been renamed by Holden, as the Commodore chassis, which was developed by Opel, who also developed a very similar chassis for the CTS. So, in essence, the GTO is riding on a modified CTS chassis.

supposedly GM is going to build the new GTO, off of a “Sigma-Lite” chassis, along with the 08 Camaro.

Sigma, right now, is used for the Cadillac STS

as far as an LS7 in a GTO? Well, the engine costs $14,000 alone.

I do know of a 6.5L Gen IV V8 LS5 engine, GM developed with 450hp, that they put in a few prototype “Judges”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\
**Post date:** [August 5, 2005, 5:59am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2008-pontiac-gto/176098/18 "2005-08-05T05:59:42Z")

</div>

> [@Gray05](#):
>
> GTO is pretty much based off the CTS chassis as is… just a “lite” version of it, it’s just been renamed by Holden, as the Commodore chassis, which was developed by Opel, who also developed a very similar chassis for the CTS. So, in essence, the GTO is riding on a modified CTS chassis.
> 
> supposedly GM is going to build the new GTO, off of a “Sigma-Lite” chassis, along with the 08 Camaro.
> 
> Sigma, right now, is used for the Cadillac STS
> 
> as far as an LS7 in a GTO? Well, the engine costs $14,000 alone.
> 
> I do know of a 6.5L Gen IV V8 LS5 engine, GM developed with 450hp, that they put in a few prototype “Judges”.

and after all of that, it will still suck and very few people will buy it

teh mustang can nevar l0se!!!

i can’t wait for the camaro to be a huge flop also. GM is fucking retarded.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gray05](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/cc9497/32.png) [@Gray05](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Gray05)\
**Post date:** [August 5, 2005, 6:03am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2008-pontiac-gto/176098/19 "2005-08-05T06:03:00Z")

</div>

> [@77rednecktruck](#):
>
> and after all of that, it will still suck and very few people will buy it
> 
> teh mustang can nevar l0se!!!
> 
> i can’t wait for the camaro to be a huge flop also. GM is fucking retarded.

well… I’ll admit, the GTO did not sell stellar numbers, but it wasn’t intended too, with limited production to only 14,000.

Now, the 05 GTO’s have sold like crazy. Putting down better performance numbers than the 05 Mustang GT.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![imported\_showtime](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/51bf81/32.png) [@imported\_showtime](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/imported_showtime)\
**Post date:** [August 5, 2005, 6:12am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2008-pontiac-gto/176098/20 "2005-08-05T06:12:28Z")

</div>

> [@Gray05](#):
>
> well… I’ll admit, the GTO did not sell stellar numbers, but it wasn’t intended too, with limited production to only 14,000.
> 
> Now, the 05 GTO’s have sold like crazy. Putting down better performance numbers than the 05 Mustang GT.

14000…wow thats real “limited”

i hope it does put down better numbers…last time i checked it was $7-10K more then a GT.

[Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2008-pontiac-gto/176098.md?page=2)
