# 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (update with dyno results)

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2009-cadillac-cts-v-update-with-dyno-results/32029>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [July 8, 2007, 6:24am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2009-cadillac-cts-v-update-with-dyno-results/32029 "2007-07-08T06:24:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 46

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![93dx\_hatch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/9/90ced4/32.png) [@93dx\_hatch](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/93dx_hatch)\
**Post date:** [September 5, 2007, 1:46pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2009-cadillac-cts-v-update-with-dyno-results/32029/46 "2007-09-05T13:46:59Z")

</div>

[quote=“Nikuk,post:43,topic:32029"”]

we were just discussing this a few weeks ago…

92 civic 70hp (1.5L)  
01 civic 106hp (51% increase) (1.6L)  
07 civic 140hp (32% increase) (1.7L)

or

92 vette - 300 (5.7L)  
97 vette - 345 (15%) (5.7L)  
02 vette - 350 (1%) (5.7L)  
07 vette - 400 (14%) (6.0L)

IB4CivicVsVette

[/quote]

Fixed, I took GM too long to figure out Displacement = Power

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2009-cadillac-cts-v-update-with-dyno-results/32029)._
