# 2010 Camaro Totalled Already **URL:** \ **Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\ **Created:** [May 10, 2009, 4:19pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2010-camaro-totalled-already/202738 "2009-05-10T16:19:57Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 52
**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\ **Post date:** [May 21, 2009, 8:08am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2010-camaro-totalled-already/202738/52 "2009-05-21T08:08:31Z")
> [@FS: Wii W/ Alot of stuff](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-wii-w-alot-of-stuff/40227/11): > > 1. mustangs were and still are geared toward middle aged women. > 2. who the eff wants luxary in an american made MUSCLE car such as a camaro, i know i dont. > 3. muscle cars should be what they were years ago. big v8s not 4.6 liters… gas guzzling, striaght line going, while throwing you back in your bucket seat via a fourspeed or powerglide and posi rearend while turning 15 inch cragar ss wheels. not using electronically controlled shit and 20 inch alloys and leather interior and digital gauges. > 4. camaro is prolly closest to oldschool pony car. becuase of comparing the 302 car of the trans am series too todays standards of muscle cars. > > where has nostalgia gone? 1. I doubt it geared for any specific age/sex. I see more men than women in mustangs 2. obviously, the majority want it or the crappy ass camaro would not have been discontinued 3. your theory of muscle cars is fine for the 60’s and early 70’s but now the cars need to more than just engines. keep living in the past 🙂 4. the new camaro sucks just like every camaro. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2010-camaro-totalled-already/202738)._