# 2010 SS vs. 2011 5.0 (a true test)

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2010-ss-vs-2011-5-0-a-true-test/205150
**Category:** PittSpeed Automotive
**Created:** [July 13, 2010, 10:55am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2010-ss-vs-2011-5-0-a-true-test/205150 "2010-07-13T10:55:42Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 21

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)
#### Post date: [July 16, 2010, 2:45am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2010-ss-vs-2011-5-0-a-true-test/205150/21 "2010-07-16T02:45:36Z")

</div>

about 10 yrs ago in GM high tech they broke it down over the years how the camaro vs stang rivalry was and who was victor. in the 80s GM only had one car worth a dam and it sure as hell didnt have a v8 under the hood. thats why after awhile there was an event buick vs mustang. The GMs were a joke, heavier and slower for the time

> [@Do you use the ignore feature?](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/do-you-use-the-ignore-feature/42395/65):
>
> stock for stock the L98 80’s cars could beat the stangs. Mild mods it was pretty close but the lighter stang out ran them once you got into full bolt ons and tunes/etc.
> 
> Not much could handle the 92 firehawk or the 89 turbo trans am 🙂 Pontiac had some quick cars back then 🙂
> 
> Oh and on the road course, the IROCZ kicked major ass

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2010-ss-vs-2011-5-0-a-true-test/205150)._