# 2011 Dodge Challenger SRT8 392

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2011-dodge-challenger-srt8-392/161900>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [October 25, 2010, 10:12am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2011-dodge-challenger-srt8-392/161900 "2010-10-25T10:12:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 13\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wahoo](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/wahoo/32/8265_2.png) [@Wahoo](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Wahoo)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2010, 10:12am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2011-dodge-challenger-srt8-392/161900/1 "2010-10-25T10:12:03Z")

</div>

**\> http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/25/2011-dodge-challenger-srt8-392-is-the-creme-de-la-chrysler/#continued**

**2011 Dodge Challenger SRT8 392 is the crème de la Chrysler**

by **[Zach Bowman](http://www.autoblog.com/bloggers/zach-bowman/)** ([**RSS feed**](http://www.autoblog.com/bloggers/zach-bowman/rss.xml)) on Oct 25th 2010 at 12:32PM [![http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/swipe-sema.png](http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/swipe-sema.png)](http://www.autoblog.com/tag/sema/)  
[![http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/10/01-chrysler-sema-630-crop.jpg](http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/10/01-chrysler-sema-630-crop.jpg)  
 ](http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-dodge-challenger-srt8-392/)_ **2011 Dodge Challenger SRT8 392 – Click above for high-res image gallery** _

[Chrysler](http://www.autoblog.com/make/chrysler) made waves [earlier today](http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/25/sema-2010-chrysler-goes-hog-wild/) when it announced the company would have an armada of 35 vehicles on display at this year’s [SEMA show](http://www.autoblog.com/category/sema/), but the star of the shindig is likely to be the new [2011 Dodge Challenger SRT8 392](http://www.autoblog.com/model/challenger).

While no one has ever accused the [Challenger SRT8](http://www.autoblog.com/model/Challenger+SRT8) of being light on grunt, Chrysler engineers have taken things up a notch or two with a new 6.4-liter V8 that produces 470 horsepower and 470 lb-ft of torque, all while delivering 15-20 percent better fuel economy than the outgoing 6.1-liter V8 in the 2010 Challenger SRT8. The big V8 uses variable valve timing and cylinder deactivation to help keep consumption low.

The Challenger SRT8 392 also employs a reworked suspension with even firmer shocks, a quicker steering ratio and more negative camber than before, all of which are supposed to help the hefty muscle bruiser tackle the corners with a little more finesse.

Up front, there’s a unique chin spoiler that helps channel air to the vehicle’s radiator and provide additional downforce at higher speeds. It also just looks pretty dang sharp.

Chrysler says it will build just 1,492 inaugural editions of the Challenger SRT8 392, and that the cars will be available to buy right after Thanksgiving. [Hit the jump](http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/25/2011-dodge-challenger-srt8-392-is-the-creme-de-la-chrysler/#continued) for the full model-specific press release.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NYstanger](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/6a8cbe/32.png) [@NYstanger](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/NYstanger)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2010, 10:18am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2011-dodge-challenger-srt8-392/161900/2 "2010-10-25T10:18:53Z")

</div>

I love it!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Joe](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/joe/32/7219_2.png) [@Joe](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Joe)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2010, 10:22am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2011-dodge-challenger-srt8-392/161900/3 "2010-10-25T10:22:17Z")

</div>

Nice, what are these guys gonna cost?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fiend540](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/bcef8e/32.png) [@fiend540](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/fiend540)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2010, 10:36am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2011-dodge-challenger-srt8-392/161900/4 "2010-10-25T10:36:52Z")

</div>

Looks pretty cool, but that name is a fucking mouthful

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![livin4hockey](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/d2c977/32.png) [@livin4hockey](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/livin4hockey)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2010, 11:53am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2011-dodge-challenger-srt8-392/161900/5 "2010-10-25T11:53:40Z")

</div>

I wish I could get my Dad to buy one of these, but he never would.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TrueBlue](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/trueblue/32/7245_2.png) [@TrueBlue](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/TrueBlue)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2010, 12:15pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2011-dodge-challenger-srt8-392/161900/6 "2010-10-25T12:15:59Z")

</div>

> [@Wahoo"](#):
>
> Chrysler says it will build just 1,492 inaugural editions

Colors available: Niña Black, Pinta Crazy, and Santa Maria Red

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ultradriver10000](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/ultradriver10000/32/7397_2.png) [@ultradriver10000](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ultradriver10000)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2010, 12:26pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2011-dodge-challenger-srt8-392/161900/7 "2010-10-25T12:26:40Z")

</div>

> [@TrueBlue](#):
>
> Colors available: Niña Black, Pinta Crazy, and Santa Maria Red

Do they offer these colors in English?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TrueBlue](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/trueblue/32/7245_2.png) [@TrueBlue](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/TrueBlue)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2010, 12:30pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2011-dodge-challenger-srt8-392/161900/8 "2010-10-25T12:30:55Z")

</div>

> [@ultradriver10000](#):
>
> Do they offer these colors in English?

Only in American.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ubengineering](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/ubengineering/32/5171_2.png) [@ubengineering](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ubengineering)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2010, 12:43pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2011-dodge-challenger-srt8-392/161900/9 "2010-10-25T12:43:45Z")

</div>

way more baller than the 5.0 or SS, looks way more retro, even if it isnt as fast

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ultradriver10000](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/ultradriver10000/32/7397_2.png) [@ultradriver10000](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ultradriver10000)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2010, 3:53pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2011-dodge-challenger-srt8-392/161900/10 "2010-10-25T15:53:59Z")

</div>

Am I missing something or is this pretty much the same car as before?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snowracer101](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/258eb7/32.png) [@snowracer101](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/snowracer101)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2010, 5:15pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2011-dodge-challenger-srt8-392/161900/11 "2010-10-25T17:15:14Z")

</div>

if these cars lost 500lbs I would own one in a heart beat.

I don’t care how fast it is, it’s a 2 ton car. FUCK THAT

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bing](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/bing/32/7211_2.png) [@bing](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bing)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2010, 6:18pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2011-dodge-challenger-srt8-392/161900/12 "2010-10-25T18:18:19Z")

</div>

mustang is betAr

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fourseasonsandles](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/90ced4/32.png) [@fourseasonsandles](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/fourseasonsandles)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2010, 8:23pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2011-dodge-challenger-srt8-392/161900/13 "2010-10-25T20:23:50Z")

</div>

Love the look of the chargers, but agree it is a fat pig.
