# 2011 Explorer

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2011-explorer/258524>\
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive\
**Created:** [May 22, 2011, 9:56am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2011-explorer/258524 "2011-05-22T09:56:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 15

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SRTBEAST](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/srtbeast/32/6665_2.png) [@SRTBEAST](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SRTBEAST)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2011, 8:18pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2011-explorer/258524/15 "2011-05-22T20:18:30Z")

</div>

> [@FS: 100's of moving blankets](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-100s-of-moving-blankets/42341/13):
>
> I think a Coyote in that downsized exploder could hold its own with the SRTs. And it would probably get better mileage. Still like the Jeep better tho.

The Explorer would have no chance against the Jeep. The Jeep is set up with full-time AWD based on a RWD platform…the Explorer would need a complete drivetrain set up as its based on a FWD powertrain…not to mention that the Jeep would have a HUGE torque advantage.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2011-explorer/258524)._