# 2012 Ford Mustang Boss 302

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2012-ford-mustang-boss-302/255392>\
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive\
**Created:** [November 3, 2010, 8:33pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2012-ford-mustang-boss-302/255392 "2010-11-03T20:33:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ninety1two40](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/ninety1two40/32/6332_2.png) [@ninety1two40](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ninety1two40)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2010, 9:33am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2012-ford-mustang-boss-302/255392/21 "2010-11-05T09:33:24Z")

</div>

BMW badge = pussy

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cossey](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/3ec8ea/32.png) [@Cossey](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Cossey)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2010, 10:04am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2012-ford-mustang-boss-302/255392/22 "2010-11-05T10:04:36Z")

</div>

> [@anyone know these punkS](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/anyone-know-these-punks/36901/23):
>
> If it outperforms the M3 in basically everyway I dont see why anyone would rather have the M3 besides subjective reasons or just to have the BMW badge.

But it doesn’t outperform the M3 in every single way. The M3 is comfortable to drive. It doesn’t have the “race-like” suspension as in the 302, or stupid cross braces that likely don’t do shit. It has a useful back seat in both a sedan and coupe configuration.

Too many idiots think that the price of a car is directly related to it’s performance. It’s not about all of the numbers, it’s about the car in it’s entirety. The M3 has a ton more features than the Mustang, and (if the LS edition has as stiff of a suspension as they say) it is a much better daily driver to the person who can afford it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![94Gt5.0](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/94gt5.0/32/6377_2.png) [@94Gt5.0](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/94Gt5.0)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2010, 10:26am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2012-ford-mustang-boss-302/255392/23 "2010-11-05T10:26:54Z")

</div>

What does the BMW offer that the 302 doesnt, Im curious? Not all of the 302 models delete the rear seat btw. Also, the suspension is adjustable from the factory, so you can make it softer for daily use, turn an knob and have a hot-lapper!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HANSTECH](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/hanstech/32/6445_2.png) [@HANSTECH](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/HANSTECH)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2010, 10:40am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2012-ford-mustang-boss-302/255392/24 "2010-11-05T10:40:44Z")

</div>

that interior doesnt look like dookie. way to go ford! m3 all day.

m3, 4 dr or 2 dr.

mustang, 2 dr or 2dr no backseat.

Im with cossey on this one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cossey](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/3ec8ea/32.png) [@Cossey](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Cossey)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2010, 10:44am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2012-ford-mustang-boss-302/255392/25 "2010-11-05T10:44:09Z")

</div>

The M3 is much more practical for a DD and has a lot more potential as a track car. You gotta think about what Ford has done to the Mustang to get it where it is. If you did the same things to the M3, it’d run laps around the 302.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![94Gt5.0](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/94gt5.0/32/6377_2.png) [@94Gt5.0](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/94Gt5.0)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2010, 10:45am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2012-ford-mustang-boss-302/255392/26 "2010-11-05T10:45:50Z")

</div>

> [@FS. 2000 Mustang Convertible only 39k Black on black $10900 b.o.](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-2000-mustang-convertible-only-39k-black-on-black-10900-b-o/36941/6):
>
> that interior doesnt look like dookie. way to go ford! m3 all day.
> 
> m3, 4 dr or 2 dr.
> 
> mustang, 2 dr or 2dr no backseat.
> 
> Im with cossey on this one.

Have you been in a 2011+ Gt? If not, you might wanna retract that statement until youve been in one! And AGAIN, you CAN get a back seat in them…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Vovchandr](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/vovchandr/32/6275_2.png) [@Vovchandr](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Vovchandr)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2010, 10:48am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2012-ford-mustang-boss-302/255392/27 "2010-11-05T10:48:45Z")

</div>

This is apples to oranges.

“my 93 boosted civic hatch is faster in 1/4 mile and around Watkins glen then a stock Ferrari and much cheaper”

“Id rather have the Ferrari”

“WTFBBQOMGDUDEZ why? It will be slower and cost you more?!?!??”

:facepalm

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HANSTECH](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/hanstech/32/6445_2.png) [@HANSTECH](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/HANSTECH)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2010, 11:01am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2012-ford-mustang-boss-302/255392/28 "2010-11-05T11:01:24Z")

</div>

> [@FS: 43" SONY TV kp-43t75](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-43-sony-tv-kp-43t75/35384/23):
>
> Have you been in a 2011+ Gt? If not, you might wanna retract that statement until youve been in one! And AGAIN, you CAN get a back seat in them…

did you not see where i put 2dr OR 2dr NO BACKSEAT.

so are you saying the mustang interior is shitty?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Vovchandr](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/vovchandr/32/6275_2.png) [@Vovchandr](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Vovchandr)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2010, 11:06am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2012-ford-mustang-boss-302/255392/29 "2010-11-05T11:06:35Z")

</div>

Bang for buck/track/stock for stock since you will be too broke to mod either after you buy them - 302

Everything else - M3

any other questions?

/thread

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HANSTECH](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/hanstech/32/6445_2.png) [@HANSTECH](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/HANSTECH)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2010, 11:14am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2012-ford-mustang-boss-302/255392/30 "2010-11-05T11:14:35Z")

</div>

> [@Delaware Rd (truth or not)](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/delaware-rd-truth-or-not/36947/15):
>
> Bang for buck/track/stock for stock since you will be too broke to mod either after you buy them - 302
> 
> Everything else - M3
> 
> any other questions?
> 
> /thread

agreed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![94Gt5.0](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/94gt5.0/32/6377_2.png) [@94Gt5.0](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/94Gt5.0)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2010, 12:48pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2012-ford-mustang-boss-302/255392/31 "2010-11-05T12:48:21Z")

</div>

So what makes the BMW automatically more quality? The name, the badge?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SRTBEAST](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/srtbeast/32/6665_2.png) [@SRTBEAST](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SRTBEAST)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2010, 1:20pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2012-ford-mustang-boss-302/255392/32 "2010-11-05T13:20:18Z")

</div>

The 302 Laguna Seca model is pretty much a track car. With the back seat delete along with other weight saving features (blanked out fogs), adjustable shocks and a front splitter that is the same as the actual 302R racing model. The 302 LS model is definitely not a daily driver…like I said before, they purpose built that model to be better than the M3 at the track only.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![94Gt5.0](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/94gt5.0/32/6377_2.png) [@94Gt5.0](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/94Gt5.0)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2010, 1:26pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2012-ford-mustang-boss-302/255392/33 "2010-11-05T13:26:22Z")

</div>

Please please please tell me you’re joking. A splitter and shocks make it a race car? Lol. It would be daily driven just fine mang

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Vovchandr](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/vovchandr/32/6275_2.png) [@Vovchandr](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Vovchandr)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2010, 1:39pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2012-ford-mustang-boss-302/255392/34 "2010-11-05T13:39:33Z")

</div>

Ariel Atom can be dailyed too, so can '38 Rat rod in theory.

A good daily means you sacrifice nothing in exchange for “fun”.

Stiff shocks, no back seat in certain trims for Christ sake even slim profile tires go against being a daily.

It’s a very generic term as anything CAN be dailyed but it’s clear as day what makes one car nicer then the other to be dailyed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TurboTravis](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/turbotravis/32/6406_2.png) [@TurboTravis](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/TurboTravis)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2010, 1:47pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2012-ford-mustang-boss-302/255392/35 "2010-11-05T13:47:04Z")

</div>

Been around these ‘street car’ arguments for years…most important things are

1)Working heat/ac  
2)Decent ground clearance  
3)Driveable in rain  
4)Not too loud  
5)Driveable on pump fuel

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mk4\_30R\_Ban](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/mk4_30r_ban/32/6347_2.png) [@Mk4\_30R\_Ban](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Mk4_30R_Ban)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2010, 1:54pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2012-ford-mustang-boss-302/255392/36 "2010-11-05T13:54:20Z")

</div>

> [@TurboTravis"](#):
>
> Been around these ‘street car’ arguments for years…most important things are
> 
> 1)Working heat/ac  
> 2)Decent ground clearance  
> 3)Driveable in rain  
> 4)Not too loud  
> 5)Driveable on pump fuel

AC not so much, but heat, and everything else for sure.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TurboTravis](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/turbotravis/32/6406_2.png) [@TurboTravis](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/TurboTravis)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2010, 1:54pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2012-ford-mustang-boss-302/255392/37 "2010-11-05T13:54:51Z")

</div>

> [@Any wine drinkers here?](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/any-wine-drinkers-here/26524/73):
>
> AC not so much, but heat, and everything else for sure.

I hear you, just some of us don’t deal with high temps well at all (me lol)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Vovchandr](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/vovchandr/32/6275_2.png) [@Vovchandr](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Vovchandr)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2010, 2:03pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2012-ford-mustang-boss-302/255392/38 "2010-11-05T14:03:52Z")

</div>

> [@TurboTravis"](#):
>
> Been around these ‘street car’ arguments for years…most important things are
> 
> 1)Working heat/ac  
> 2)Decent ground clearance  
> 3)Driveable in rain  
> 4)Not too loud  
> 5)Driveable on pump fuel

Very true and all good points for it even qualify as a street car.

However the argument here is not whether or not it’s a street car, its to the fact that BMW would make a BETTER daily, all around car.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TurboTravis](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/turbotravis/32/6406_2.png) [@TurboTravis](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/TurboTravis)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2010, 2:10pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2012-ford-mustang-boss-302/255392/39 "2010-11-05T14:10:13Z")

</div>

> [@FS 1991 VW Jetta GLI](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-1991-vw-jetta-gli/36281/24):
>
> Very true and all good points for it even qualify as a street car.
> 
> However the argument here is not whether or not it’s a street car, its to the fact that BMW would make a BETTER daily, all around car.

The argument could go on and on and on…I’d venture to guess that the Mustang is a more reliable car.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Vovchandr](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/vovchandr/32/6275_2.png) [@Vovchandr](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Vovchandr)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2010, 3:00pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2012-ford-mustang-boss-302/255392/40 "2010-11-05T15:00:54Z")

</div>

> [@TurboTravis"](#):
>
> The argument could go on and on and on…I’d venture to guess that the Mustang is a more reliable car.

Wouldn’t argue that one bit.

In 10 years I’d rather be the Ford owner between the likely depreciation and reliability.

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2012-ford-mustang-boss-302/255392.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2012-ford-mustang-boss-302/255392.md?page=3)
