# 2013 Federal Assault Weapons Ban

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2013-federal-assault-weapons-ban/265858>\
**Category:** Shift518 Off Topic\
**Created:** [December 27, 2012, 7:15pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2013-federal-assault-weapons-ban/265858 "2012-12-27T19:15:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 155

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![imported\_hybrdthry91](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/imported_hybrdthry91/32/6315_2.png) [@imported\_hybrdthry91](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/imported_hybrdthry91)\
**Post date:** [January 13, 2013, 2:37pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2013-federal-assault-weapons-ban/265858/155 "2013-01-13T14:37:08Z")

</div>

> [@FS:96 Black Mitsubishi Eclipse RS-T: 3700 OBO](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-96-black-mitsubishi-eclipse-rs-t-3700-obo/49545/42):
>
> Defensive VS offensive weapons is an interesting point.
> 
> One might consider the old mantra of what the “the best offense is…”
> 
> I don’t want to get into a deep discussion on this as many of those weapons, can and have been used as defense. Most basic examples of explosives is mines/IED’s. If the government was coming to take over your house, mines would make a great defense against vehicles and personnel. Arguably one of the most effective ones.
> 
> I’m curious on your point where you aren’t OK with them owning guns, yet you aren’t OK with actually going through and weeding them out.

Going through and weeding them out? Remember the whole innocent before being proven guilty? Same thing should apply here. God forbid we require a free photo identification to vote, that would be infringing on our rights. That would disenfranchise many voters, but our rights to own a firearm they have no problems disenfranchising the fuck out of those.

I’m in agreement with BDSK noone should have to go through a psych eval to get a gun. If they are already under watch or required to see a shrink then by all means checks can be in place for that. But If I wanted to go buy a gun and don’t have a felony, and don’t already have a history of mental illness I should not have to be evaluated.

Lets sum up the requirements lefties want and/or already have in place to use our 2nd amendment protected right:  
FBI background check.  
Mental health evaluation.  
Firearm training course.  
State Permit/ID card and/or Conceal carry permit which requires police chief or judge’s approval, and often require you to justify why you want to use that right.  
Several hundred dollars in fees for permits/training courses.  
Huge tax on guns/ammo  
Insurance  
3-10 day wait period

VS voting:  
Free ID.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2013-federal-assault-weapons-ban/265858)._
