# 2013 Federal Assault Weapons Ban

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2013-federal-assault-weapons-ban/265858>\
**Category:** Shift518 Off Topic\
**Created:** [December 27, 2012, 7:15pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2013-federal-assault-weapons-ban/265858 "2012-12-27T19:15:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 64

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Neo187H](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/898d66/32.png) [@Neo187H](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Neo187H)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2013, 10:47am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2013-federal-assault-weapons-ban/265858/64 "2013-01-07T10:47:18Z")

</div>

> [@The wife wants a BOAT. Boat people come in.](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-wife-wants-a-boat-boat-people-come-in/51408/15):
>
> While I still believe that this specific law proposition is silly…
> 
> An attempt to remove certain guns from the population has a lot more merit and history of damage than outlawing something as yelling fire in a crowded theater, which is already enabled and is infringing on the constitution under a blanket of a “common good and safety”
> 
> Bringing tear gas with 3 guns to a theater springs to mind.
> 
> If they outlawed one due to a few precedent cases of people being killed, are you really surprised they are attempting to outlaw this. That’s pretty much as parallel as you can get. Two acts committed in crowded theaters causing deaths resulting in attempted infringements on the constitution.

Vlad you’ve made some good points in the thread but this is just silly. Purposely inciting a riot and carrying a gun into a movie theater are comparable things?

Never mind that the movie theater that the incident happened in has a “Gun-free zone” policy, thereby making it illegal to have a gun in the theater in the first place.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/2013-federal-assault-weapons-ban/265858)._