# 240 \> Trans Am

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/240-trans-am/193373
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic
**Created:** [October 30, 2007, 6:58am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/240-trans-am/193373 "2007-10-30T06:58:01Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![smokeyburnouts](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/smokeyburnouts/32/5987_2.png) [@smokeyburnouts](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/smokeyburnouts)
#### Post date: [October 30, 2007, 7:15am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/240-trans-am/193373/5 "2007-10-30T07:15:32Z")

</div>

> [@WTF: v. post your best HOFF Pics](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wtf-v-post-your-best-hoff-pics/33254/10):
>
> no… really it was. the elevation of the 240 was greater then the trans am. The proof is in the pudding

trans am is still ahead of it tho, as it should be

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/240-trans-am/193373)._