# 27 dead in school shooting **URL:** \ **Category:** Shift518 Off Topic\ **Created:** [December 14, 2012, 10:01am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/27-dead-in-school-shooting/265750 "2012-12-14T10:01:55Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 342
**Author:** ![Oleg](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/oleg/32/6276_2.png) [@Oleg](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Oleg)\ **Post date:** [December 20, 2012, 6:47am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/27-dead-in-school-shooting/265750/342 "2012-12-20T06:47:35Z")
> [@CATURDAY](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/caturday/17848/371): > > What would be the argument with this? Seems reasonable and prudent… Someone would have to clearly define the conditions that would preclude an individual from owning a firearm, meaning basically that they’d have to diagnose people with “potentially homicidal wacko” stamp. This shooter supposedly had Aspengers, which in US is considered a social disorder, while some other countries link it to Schizophrenia. Schizophrenics are often violent, which is also a whole another can of worms. Furthermore if someone was diagnosed and precluded from owning a gun, the rational thing to do would be to institutionalize them so they don’t hurt others by other means. That’s an even bigger can of worms. Anti-gun advocates would never agree to institutionalize and/or forcibly medicate people. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/27-dead-in-school-shooting/265750)._