# 36 million drivers would flunk

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/36-million-drivers-would-flunk/193695>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [November 16, 2007, 3:21pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/36-million-drivers-would-flunk/193695 "2007-11-16T15:21:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 28

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\
**Post date:** [November 28, 2007, 2:44pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/36-million-drivers-would-flunk/193695/28 "2007-11-28T14:44:41Z")

</div>

> [@69 Camaro resto - It's ALIVE! - no 56k](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/69-camaro-resto-its-alive-no-56k/13530/470):
>
> 95%
> 
> Why is A a correct option? Slower traffic keep right…

Different states different laws.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/36-million-drivers-would-flunk/193695)._
