# 3rd gen camaro 4th gen wing

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/3rd-gen-camaro-4th-gen-wing/191240>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [July 18, 2007, 5:11pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/3rd-gen-camaro-4th-gen-wing/191240 "2007-07-18T17:11:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 18

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SixSpeed454SS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e19adc/32.png) [@SixSpeed454SS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SixSpeed454SS)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2007, 8:49pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/3rd-gen-camaro-4th-gen-wing/191240/18 "2007-07-24T20:49:04Z")

</div>

> [@Need some advice V. Sandals All Inclusive Resorts](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/need-some-advice-v-sandals-all-inclusive-resorts/31401/14):
>
> I’m not one for wings & ground effects, but these cars don’t look right without wings & ground effects.

> [@jet ski buildup thread with pics (now with completed pix)](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/jet-ski-buildup-thread-with-pics-now-with-completed-pix/15724/94):
>
> No way. 91-92 'Birds without ground effects look amazing, and earlier third-gen Camaro’s without ground effects are SEX.
> 
> ![http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v439/DanTheManCelica/firehawk.jpg](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/uploads/speedlife/original/3X/f/b/fbd4deb06fbdabddce04cefd42e7d623ebbfd509.jpeg)  
> ![http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v439/DanTheManCelica/100_0448resize.jpg](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/uploads/speedlife/original/3X/e/3/e3e776096f34fa65ae7aaaff34b4a6c2228034fb.jpeg)

I meant Camaros. '91-'92 Formulas look better than any other 4th gen fbody. IROC would be my next favorite.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/3rd-gen-camaro-4th-gen-wing/191240)._