# 50 greatest muscle cars

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/50-greatest-muscle-cars/167273>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [June 21, 2004, 3:01pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/50-greatest-muscle-cars/167273 "2004-06-21T15:01:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![smokeyburnouts](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/smokeyburnouts/32/5987_2.png) [@smokeyburnouts](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/smokeyburnouts)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2004, 7:39am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/50-greatest-muscle-cars/167273/21 "2004-06-22T07:39:54Z")

</div>

the muscle cars back in the day had the power, but the hook-up was probably the biggest problem.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2004, 9:43am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/50-greatest-muscle-cars/167273/22 "2004-06-22T09:43:16Z")

</div>

> [@8.1crew](#):
>
> what does trap speed have to do with et???WAY TO MANY DIFFERANT THINGS CHANGE TRAP SPEED!!!1

that is something to think about. my bike traps at 143 and a six00RR traps at 125 but both bikes can do 10s figure that out. i do know that the 1000RR has a hard time with the tire staying on hte ground

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pewter](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/pewter/32/5936_2.png) [@Pewter](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Pewter)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2004, 9:57am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/50-greatest-muscle-cars/167273/23 "2004-06-22T09:57:32Z")

</div>

> [@Quik](#):
>
> that is something to think about. my bike traps at 143 and a six00RR traps at 125 but both bikes can do 10s figure that out. i do know that the 1000RR has a hard time with the tire staying on hte ground

top end rides,low end rides,n/a & boosted rides=all differant!!! 🆒

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![slowcamaro](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/slowcamaro/32/5975_2.png) [@slowcamaro](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/slowcamaro)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2004, 10:00am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/50-greatest-muscle-cars/167273/24 "2004-06-22T10:00:41Z")

</div>

Bikes = poop

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ShalerPunk](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shalerpunk/32/5976_2.png) [@ShalerPunk](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ShalerPunk)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2004, 10:14am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/50-greatest-muscle-cars/167273/25 "2004-06-22T10:14:28Z")

</div>

you can’t compare a muscle car to a modern car.

period.

they serve much different purposes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2004, 10:18am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/50-greatest-muscle-cars/167273/26 "2004-06-22T10:18:55Z")

</div>

> [@slowcamaro](#):
>
> Bikes = poop

thats because no matter what bike you sit on. you make it look like a vesba

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Blue](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/3bc359/32.png) [@Blue](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Blue)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2004, 11:57am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/50-greatest-muscle-cars/167273/27 "2004-06-22T11:57:33Z")

</div>

> [@Black\_WS6](#):
>
> while we’re at it, let’s name the cars from this era (american version) compared to today’s american cars.
> 
> Cobra  
> LS1  
> Z06  
> Viper
> 
> Vs.
> 
> Supra  
> 3000GT  
> WRX  
> EVO

stock for stock?

Correct me if im wrong

(using average times, not the best)  
Cobra 12.6 @ 114  
LS1 F-body 13.1 @ 108  
Z06 12.2 @ 116  
Viper SRT-10 11.7 @ 119

Supra TT 13.5 @ 105  
3000GT VR4 14.0 @ 99  
WRX STi 13.4 @ 102  
EVO 13.4 @ 101

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OLDS\_ROCKETMAN](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/olds_rocketman/32/5942_2.png) [@OLDS\_ROCKETMAN](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/OLDS_ROCKETMAN)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2004, 12:44pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/50-greatest-muscle-cars/167273/28 "2004-06-22T12:44:13Z")

</div>

30 + YEARS OF TECHNOLOGY!!!

If those cars came out like that today they would be 40+ grand. my GS is near 4200 lbs, i don’t think any factory ls1 equiped car is that heavy.

by the way i’m number 9 on that list

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![slowcamaro](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/slowcamaro/32/5975_2.png) [@slowcamaro](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/slowcamaro)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2004, 12:45pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/50-greatest-muscle-cars/167273/29 "2004-06-22T12:45:51Z")

</div>

fbody weighs 3600 pds

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OLDS\_ROCKETMAN](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/olds_rocketman/32/5942_2.png) [@OLDS\_ROCKETMAN](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/OLDS_ROCKETMAN)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2004, 12:46pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/50-greatest-muscle-cars/167273/30 "2004-06-22T12:46:03Z")

</div>

i wouldn’t say that a cobra or a vette is really a muscle car but a sports car, but anyway my dad is rollin the number 3 car on that list.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Blue](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/3bc359/32.png) [@Blue](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Blue)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2004, 12:47pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/50-greatest-muscle-cars/167273/31 "2004-06-22T12:47:36Z")

</div>

> [@Cutty](#):
>
> 30 + YEARS OF TECHNOLOGY!!!
> 
> If those cars came out like that today they would be 40+ grand. my GS is near 4200 lbs, i don’t think any factory ls1 equiped car is that heavy.
> 
> by the way i’m number 9 on that list

Cadillac CTS-V 4100lbs. LS6 powered 400hp

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2004, 12:54pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/50-greatest-muscle-cars/167273/32 "2004-06-22T12:54:41Z")

</div>

> [@Cutty](#):
>
> 30 + YEARS OF TECHNOLOGY!!!
> 
> If those cars came out like that today they would be 40+ grand. my GS is near 4200 lbs, i don’t think any factory ls1 equiped car is that heavy.
> 
> by the way i’m number 9 on that list

what about a Gen III LSequipped motor vehicle… i got one that weighed in at 4400lbs and pewter got one aroudn the same weight also

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2004, 12:55pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/50-greatest-muscle-cars/167273/33 "2004-06-22T12:55:14Z")

</div>

who cares

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![slowcamaro](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/slowcamaro/32/5975_2.png) [@slowcamaro](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/slowcamaro)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2004, 12:56pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/50-greatest-muscle-cars/167273/34 "2004-06-22T12:56:18Z")

</div>

:1320:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OLDS\_ROCKETMAN](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/olds_rocketman/32/5942_2.png) [@OLDS\_ROCKETMAN](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/OLDS_ROCKETMAN)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2004, 1:00pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/50-greatest-muscle-cars/167273/35 "2004-06-22T13:00:48Z")

</div>

> [@Quik](#):
>
> what about a Gen III LSequipped motor vehicle… i got one that weighed in at 4400lbs and pewter got one aroudn the same weight also

yeah and neither one of those can touch the cars at the top of the list in stock form.

as for that caddy, thats 34 years of technology over a 70 GS and top of the line for GM. The GS in 1970 was a high average priced car, the CTSV is a fuckin expensive luxury car. I use the GS for the examples cause i have one but its that same for a lot of those cars

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2004, 1:03pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/50-greatest-muscle-cars/167273/36 "2004-06-22T13:03:03Z")

</div>

> [@Cutty](#):
>
> yeah and neither one of those can touch the cars at the top of the list in stock form.
> 
> as for that caddy, thats 34 years of technology over a 70 GS and top of the line for GM. The GS in 1970 was a high average priced car, the CTSV is a fuckin expensive luxury car. I use the GS for the examples cause i have one but its that same for a lot of those cars

actually your GS is alot quicker then the same car of those eras. [ie. chevelle,tempest,and the other twins]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![slowcamaro](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/slowcamaro/32/5975_2.png) [@slowcamaro](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/slowcamaro)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2004, 1:03pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/50-greatest-muscle-cars/167273/37 "2004-06-22T13:03:57Z")

</div>

i thought the ctsv was in the 30,000 :dunno: maybe i am wrong…but if it is then it the cheaper of the cadilac line

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2004, 1:12pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/50-greatest-muscle-cars/167273/38 "2004-06-22T13:12:09Z")

</div>

> [@slowcamaro](#):
>
> i thought the ctsv was in the 30,000 :dunno: maybe i am wrong…but if it is then it the cheaper of the cadilac line

that is the model with the six banger in it

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![slowcamaro](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/slowcamaro/32/5975_2.png) [@slowcamaro](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/slowcamaro)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2004, 1:12pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/50-greatest-muscle-cars/167273/39 "2004-06-22T13:12:49Z")

</div>

oooh …thats why i was asking

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OLDS\_ROCKETMAN](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/olds_rocketman/32/5942_2.png) [@OLDS\_ROCKETMAN](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/OLDS_ROCKETMAN)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2004, 1:13pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/50-greatest-muscle-cars/167273/40 "2004-06-22T13:13:46Z")

</div>

oh yeah, 70 GS(X)'s were winning the super car showdown a few years during the 80’s. The GSCA hosted a 3 race shoot out between a bone stock Stage 1 and hemi cuda, the GS and hemi split the first two and the mopar boys put the cuda back on the trailer and boo hoo’ed after the third race. The 69 H/O, ls6 chevelle nor the the 70 Judge could touch the 70 GS stage1.

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/50-greatest-muscle-cars/167273.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/50-greatest-muscle-cars/167273.md?page=3)
