# 504HP/550lb-ft stock Toyota?

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/504hp-550lb-ft-stock-toyota/58088
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive
**Created:** [November 13, 2008, 8:21am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/504hp-550lb-ft-stock-toyota/58088 "2008-11-13T08:21:19Z")
**Posts on this page:** 5
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![mike125k](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/mike125k/32/7282_2.png) [@mike125k](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/mike125k)
#### Post date: [November 13, 2008, 11:41am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/504hp-550lb-ft-stock-toyota/58088/61 "2008-11-13T11:41:17Z")

</div>

^ at least he’s comparing apples to apples. Let’s see how well your built Civic can hold sheets of plywood.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![fiend540](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/bcef8e/32.png) [@fiend540](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/fiend540)
#### Post date: [November 13, 2008, 11:46am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/504hp-550lb-ft-stock-toyota/58088/62 "2008-11-13T11:46:33Z")

</div>

> [@sedlmeier101](#):
>
> No offense but you don’t get 30 mpg on the thruway, unless you are doing like 30mph down a hill.
> 
> My dad had a duramax, and I had a modded cummins and the best we both ever saw was 21 mpg on the thruway

My uncle regularly gets 24mpg highway with his, but 30 seems very high. For comparison the best i could get in my works new powerstroke was 12:mamoru:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![MOBOOST4U](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f4b2a3/32.png) [@MOBOOST4U](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/MOBOOST4U)
#### Post date: [November 13, 2008, 12:00pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/504hp-550lb-ft-stock-toyota/58088/63 "2008-11-13T12:00:46Z")

</div>

Beautiful truck… just loose the chrome grill, it looks so out of place. It should be black.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![SideWinderGX](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/fbc32d/32.png) [@SideWinderGX](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SideWinderGX)
#### Post date: [November 13, 2008, 12:02pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/504hp-550lb-ft-stock-toyota/58088/64 "2008-11-13T12:02:46Z")

</div>

> [@mike125k](#):
>
> ^ at least he’s comparing apples to apples. Let’s see how well your built Civic can hold sheets of plywood.

I just whipped out the Civic comment to prove a point.

The SRT-10, Syclone and this Tundra really aren’t made for the sole purpose of lugging stuff around. You don’t need 500+ hp to do that.

> [@Wikipedia"](#):
>
> Unlike the previous [Ram Trucks](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_Ram), the SRT-10 was built solely for the purpose of speed.

The SRT-10 also has a lower towing capacity than the standard 2008 Tundra. On top of that, it’s a pain to even use the bed because of the spoiler, functional or not.

The Syclone’s towing capacity is laughable, although the bed is more useable.

Tundra == more useable as a truck, and faster.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![BigRon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/58956e/32.png) [@BigRon](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BigRon)
#### Post date: [November 13, 2008, 1:18pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/504hp-550lb-ft-stock-toyota/58088/65 "2008-11-13T13:18:51Z")

</div>

Since all the add-ons are aftermarket, Toyota’s CAFE numbers won’t be effected since the truck isn’t rolling off the line. Not to mention I doubt you have to pay a ‘gas-guzzler’ tax on it.  
Pretty smart actually.

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/504hp-550lb-ft-stock-toyota/58088.md?page=3)
