# 605whp Civic vs 900whp Dodge Diesel **URL:** \ **Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\ **Created:** [September 12, 2007, 8:09pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279 "2007-09-12T20:09:42Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 2
**Author:** ![newman](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/newman/32/7569_2.png) [@newman](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/newman)\ **Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 7:16am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279/21 "2007-09-13T07:16:37Z")
haha. i’d put a VW on a trailer then tow it to a 12 second pass to be the fastest VW ever. ---
**Author:** ![Haenszel](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/e68b1a/32.png) [@Haenszel](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Haenszel)\ **Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 7:23am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279/22 "2007-09-13T07:23:08Z")
[quote=“sedlmeier101,post:16,topic:35279"”] Yes, I know, But it sounded like you were trying to correct me… if you woulda said that ^^ in the first place then it would be fine. [/quote] uhhh… [quote=“turbo ls1 ss,post:10,topic:35279"”] sequential turbos [/quote] [quote=“turbo ls1 ss,post:12,topic:35279"”] its also called sequential turbocharging :smash2: [/quote] ---
**Author:** ![Haenszel](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/e68b1a/32.png) [@Haenszel](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Haenszel)\ **Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 7:24am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279/23 "2007-09-13T07:24:23Z")
[quote=“newman,post:21,topic:35279"”] haha. i’d put a VW on a trailer then tow it to a 12 second pass to be the fastest VW ever. [/quote] :massmoon: 🙂 . ---
**Author:** ![Studderin](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/studderin/32/7197_2.png) [@Studderin](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Studderin)\ **Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 7:25am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279/24 "2007-09-13T07:25:59Z")
[quote=“newman,post:21,topic:35279"”] haha. i’d put a VW on a trailer then tow it to a 12 second pass to be the fastest VW ever. [/quote] or the somedude ---
**Author:** ![jay\_g](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jay_g/32/111288_2.png) [@jay\_g](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/jay_g)\ **Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 7:44am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279/25 "2007-09-13T07:44:12Z")
:lol: ---
**Author:** ![Bacon](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/bacon/32/7230_2.png) [@Bacon](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Bacon)\ **Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 7:46am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279/26 "2007-09-13T07:46:14Z")
[quote=“newman,post:21,topic:35279"”] haha. i’d put a VW on a trailer then tow it to a 12 second pass to be the fastest VW ever. [/quote] 🤣 ---
**Author:** ![66impalass](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/66impalass/32/7429_2.png) [@66impalass](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/66impalass)\ **Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 7:49am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279/27 "2007-09-13T07:49:10Z")
[quote=“Haenszel,post:22,topic:35279"”] uhhh… [/quote] if you have not seen his other posts, logic is not his strong suit ---
**Author:** ![nytegrsx.com](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/b5ac83/32.png) [@nytegrsx.com](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/nytegrsx.com)\ **Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 8:00am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279/28 "2007-09-13T08:00:53Z")
compound turbo’s give you the effect of a large turbo minus the lag. ---
**Author:** ![1BADGPGT](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/1badgpgt/32/5123_2.png) [@1BADGPGT](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/1BADGPGT)\ **Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 5:50pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279/29 "2007-09-13T17:50:01Z")
> Originally Posted by newman: View Post > haha. i’d put a VW on a trailer then tow it to a 12 second pass to be the fastest VW ever. > Originally Posted By Studderin: or the somedude LMAO…thats not nice john. ---
**Author:** ![Nikuk](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/nikuk/32/7254_2.png) [@Nikuk](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Nikuk)\ **Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 6:04pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279/30 "2007-09-13T18:04:32Z")
1.60 60 10.8 1/4 600whp ? ---
**Author:** ![psphinx81](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/e9a140/32.png) [@psphinx81](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/psphinx81)\ **Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 6:09pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279/31 "2007-09-13T18:09:17Z")
[quote=“newman,post:21,topic:35279"”] haha. i’d put a VW on a trailer then tow it to a 12 second pass to be the fastest VW ever. [/quote] LMAO ---
**Author:** ![DrDoS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ccd318/32.png) [@DrDoS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/DrDoS)\ **Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 7:27pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279/32 "2007-09-13T19:27:16Z")
[quote=“newman,post:21,topic:35279"”] haha. i’d put a VW on a trailer then tow it to a 12 second pass to be the fastest VW ever. [/quote] 👏 ---
**Author:** ![snowracer101](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/258eb7/32.png) [@snowracer101](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/snowracer101)\ **Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 8:16pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279/33 "2007-09-13T20:16:20Z")
[quote=“[nytegrsx.com](http://nytegrsx.com),post:28,topic:35279"”] compound turbo’s give you the effect of a large turbo minus the lag. [/quote] YEs, as this cummins ram has. COMPOUND turbos… AKA sequential turbos… HE said sequential turbos like what I said was wrong. Either way… what newman said:rofl: ---
**Author:** ![layzie](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/layzie/32/7599_2.png) [@layzie](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/layzie)\ **Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 10:14pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279/34 "2007-09-13T22:14:41Z")
i seen this video on h-t awhile ago. ---
**Author:** ![woody](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/woody/32/7191_2.png) [@woody](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/woody)\ **Post date:** [September 14, 2007, 5:25am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279/35 "2007-09-14T05:25:39Z")
[quote=“sedlmeier101,post:33,topic:35279"”] YEs, as this cummins ram has. COMPOUND turbos… AKA sequential turbos… HE said sequential turbos like what I said was wrong. Either way… what newman said:rofl: [/quote] its not wrong. its just that most everyone refers to that kind of a setup as ‘sequential’. i personally have never heard of it being called ‘compound’ before. must be a mopar thing. ---
**Author:** ![turbociv](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/dfb087/32.png) [@turbociv](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/turbociv)\ **Post date:** [September 14, 2007, 5:25am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279/36 "2007-09-14T05:25:44Z")
[quote=“Nikuk,post:30,topic:35279"”] 1.60 60 10.8 1/4 600whp ? [/quote] yep, monster trap but low et. in the vid you can hear the civic loose traction at the top of almost every gear. ---
**Author:** ![66impalass](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/66impalass/32/7429_2.png) [@66impalass](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/66impalass)\ **Post date:** [September 14, 2007, 5:31am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279/37 "2007-09-14T05:31:36Z")
[quote=“layzie,post:34,topic:35279"”] i seen this video on h-t awhile ago. [/quote] \*SAW ---
**Author:** ![layzie](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/layzie/32/7599_2.png) [@layzie](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/layzie)\ **Post date:** [September 14, 2007, 8:16am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279/38 "2007-09-14T08:16:30Z")
you really are a fucking faggot. ---
**Author:** ![snowracer101](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/258eb7/32.png) [@snowracer101](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/snowracer101)\ **Post date:** [September 14, 2007, 8:38am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279/39 "2007-09-14T08:38:16Z")
[quote=“woody,post:35,topic:35279"”] its not wrong. its just that most everyone refers to that kind of a setup as ‘sequential’. i personally have never heard of it being called ‘compound’ before. must be a mopar thing. [/quote] Yuck. Don’t ever refer to the cummins as _mopar_ haha, yeah I guess I read way to many diesel magazines. sequential turbos AKA Compound turbos. DONE ---
**Author:** ![Twizted](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/twizted/32/7206_2.png) [@Twizted](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Twizted)\ **Post date:** [September 14, 2007, 8:55am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279/40 "2007-09-14T08:55:24Z")
id rock that truck [Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279.md?page=1) [Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279.md?page=3)