# 605whp Civic vs 900whp Dodge Diesel

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive
**Created:** [September 12, 2007, 8:09pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279 "2007-09-12T20:09:42Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 33

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![snowracer101](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/258eb7/32.png) [@snowracer101](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/snowracer101)
#### Post date: [September 13, 2007, 8:16pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279/33 "2007-09-13T20:16:20Z")

</div>

[quote=“[nytegrsx.com](http://nytegrsx.com),post:28,topic:35279"”]

compound turbo’s give you the effect of a large turbo minus the lag.

[/quote]

YEs, as this cummins ram has.

COMPOUND turbos… AKA sequential turbos…

HE said sequential turbos like what I said was wrong.

Either way… what newman said:rofl:

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279)._