# 605whp Civic vs 900whp Dodge Diesel

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive
**Created:** [September 12, 2007, 8:09pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279 "2007-09-12T20:09:42Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 35

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![woody](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/woody/32/7191_2.png) [@woody](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/woody)
#### Post date: [September 14, 2007, 5:25am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279/35 "2007-09-14T05:25:39Z")

</div>

[quote=“sedlmeier101,post:33,topic:35279"”]

YEs, as this cummins ram has.

COMPOUND turbos… AKA sequential turbos…

HE said sequential turbos like what I said was wrong.

Either way… what newman said:rofl:

[/quote]

its not wrong. its just that most everyone refers to that kind of a setup as ‘sequential’. i personally have never heard of it being called ‘compound’ before. must be a mopar thing.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279)._