# 605whp Civic vs 900whp Dodge Diesel

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [September 12, 2007, 8:09pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279 "2007-09-12T20:09:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 50

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![articzap](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/articzap/32/7361_2.png) [@articzap](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/articzap)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2007, 6:54pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279/50 "2007-09-14T18:54:18Z")

</div>

The problem with sequential turbos is no matter how you route it, at upper boost levels its there going to back up or not have enough air flow depending on how its done. One larger turbo would probably be more effective. Just ask the Supra/RX-7 guys. (I believe RX-7 was sequential turbo)

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/605whp-civic-vs-900whp-dodge-diesel/35279)._