# 64 impala SS? yay or nay

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/64-impala-ss-yay-or-nay/162447>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [October 21, 2003, 2:47pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/64-impala-ss-yay-or-nay/162447 "2003-10-21T14:47:54Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![imported\_gearhead](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/imported_gearhead/32/5957_2.png) [@imported\_gearhead](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/imported_gearhead)\
**Post date:** [October 27, 2003, 6:47am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/64-impala-ss-yay-or-nay/162447/21 "2003-10-27T06:47:48Z")

</div>

> _Originally posted by 2kaltima_   
> **[http://chevysupersports.com/Impala61-64.htm](http://chevysupersports.com/Impala61-64.htm)  
> I don’t think the 396 was around in 64, I could be wrong though.  
> Hannibal - If it is an original 409 with matching numbers it is worth a whole lot more than 10 grand. I’ve seen them in Hemmings for upwards of 35grand for a really nice 409**

The 396 was availible starting in 1965. The standard SS package in 64 had the 327 with optional 409’s…u could get the 340hp, the 400hp 4 barrel or the monster 2-4’s 425hp car. I think there were only 8-9000 409’s total.

There is no way that it’s a 409 if that wasn’t the first words of the ad.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HaNnIBaL64](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/hannibal64/32/5954_2.png) [@HaNnIBaL64](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/HaNnIBaL64)\
**Post date:** [October 27, 2003, 10:02am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/64-impala-ss-yay-or-nay/162447/22 "2003-10-27T10:02:25Z")

</div>

it wasnt an ad… it was a car i stumbled across while i was driving 🙂

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/64-impala-ss-yay-or-nay/162447.md?page=1)