# 84 Hurst Olds on Muscle Cars **URL:** \ **Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\ **Created:** [August 9, 2009, 12:02pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/84-hurst-olds-on-muscle-cars/203410 "2009-08-09T12:02:46Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 8
**Author:** ![OLDS\_ROCKETMAN](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/olds_rocketman/32/5942_2.png) [@OLDS\_ROCKETMAN](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/OLDS_ROCKETMAN)\ **Post date:** [August 19, 2009, 10:34pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/84-hurst-olds-on-muscle-cars/203410/8 "2009-08-19T22:34:32Z")
> [@Auto Financing 101 - and Loans in General](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/auto-financing-101-and-loans-in-general/40895/17): > > 180hp in a v8=poop… the 307 was a junk motor 180 hp in the 80;s wasnt poop thou. in todays comparisions yes…compared in its field…not at all. the 307 was not junk either… it was a motor that was very reliable in passenger cars that was clearly not designed for performance… the iron duke was no hig performer either but u’d be hard pressed to find someone call it junk. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/84-hurst-olds-on-muscle-cars/203410)._