# 9/11 controlled demolition?
**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/9-11-controlled-demolition/724
**Category:** NYSpeed Off Topic
**Created:** [July 11, 2005, 6:40am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/9-11-controlled-demolition/724 "2005-07-11T06:40:15Z")
**Posts on this page:** 7
**Page:** 3
### Author:  [@slow84ta](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/slow84ta)
#### Post date: [July 22, 2005, 10:07am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/9-11-controlled-demolition/724/41 "2005-07-22T10:07:50Z")
> [@HotRodKid](#):
>
> the wtc’s werent designed to take a hit from a 747 …
>
> it was the 707 that was out during the design of the twin towers, and thats what the design would have been bases around
>
> like you said … designed to withstand the impact, but once the insulation burns off the support beams the fuel will cook the carbon out of the steel
>
> they were designed to take a hit from a 707, which carries 23,000g of fuel but the 747’s that hit carried 57,000g of fuel
>
> big fuckin difference
>
> after the first 23000 gallons burn out of the building, your prolly nearing the limit of the design, and then you still have 24000 left to burn …
>
> take a piece of high carbon steel (rocker panel or frame material) and attempt to bend it … then get it red hot with a torch, let it cool and try again …
>
> notice all the carbon thats on the surface too
yea man for real!
Why the hell in gods name would a country do this? Those so-called explosions in floors before the “collapse” were obviosuly from all the shit from floors above crashing down the towers. Kind of like an emploding effect. I think a few people just have too much time on there hands and wanna make something of nothing. I have seen a few other tapes that even suggested Bush and Bin-Laden were freinds and oil partners rofl. Some people just really need to be deleted from the jean pool
---
### Author:  [@RuBiCaNT](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/RuBiCaNT)
#### Post date: [July 22, 2005, 10:14am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/9-11-controlled-demolition/724/42 "2005-07-22T10:14:39Z")
> [@slow84ta](#):
>
> yea man for real!
>
> Why the hell in gods name would a country do this? Those so-called explosions in floors before the “collapse” were obviosuly from all the shit from floors above crashing down the towers. Kind of like an emploding effect. I think a few people just have too much time on there hands and wanna make something of nothing. I have seen a few other tapes that even suggested Bush and Bin-Laden were freinds and oil partners rofl. Some people just really need to be deleted from the jean pool
You should read more often…
[http://www.thefarleft.com/Essays\_files/911\_conspiracy\_theory\_paper.pdf](http://www.thefarleft.com/Essays_files/911_conspiracy_theory_paper.pdf)
> There is great evidence that “the Roosevelt administration was fully aware of the
> oncoming [attack on Pearl Harbor]” before the attack occurred. Before the attack on Pearl
> Harbor “88 percent of Americans opposed U. S. involvement in the European War.”
> However after the attack there was overwhelming support for it. At the time of the attacks
> there were no aircraft carriers, or any other valuable ships, in Pearl Harbor. Only aging
> ships, which were, after the attack, refurbished. After the attack they were better than
> before.
> To prevent civilian ships from stumbling on the Japanese task force, and alerting
> Pearl Harbor, the US navy issued and order prohibiting civilian ships from traveling
> through the north pacific. There is evidence that the day before the attack anti-torpedo
> nets were removed for unexplained reasons.
> The Pearl Harbor conspiracy is still but a theory, but a commonly accepted
> theory. It’s your decision.
---
### Author:  [@TrueBlue](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/TrueBlue)
#### Post date: [July 22, 2005, 10:17am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/9-11-controlled-demolition/724/43 "2005-07-22T10:17:37Z")
I could drive several mack trucks through the holes in this “theory.” Popular Mechanics did a great story a few months back about debunking 9/11 myths, using several sources from each category - industry leaders in construction, aviation experts, forensic scientists, etc. if you’re into that stuff, I can probably dig it up.
---
### Author:  [@Lucky\_Cheater](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Lucky_Cheater)
#### Post date: [July 22, 2005, 10:51am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/9-11-controlled-demolition/724/44 "2005-07-22T10:51:39Z")
> [@slow84ta](#):
>
> yea man for real!
>
> I think a few people just have too much time on there hands and wanna make something of nothing.
perhaps you mean “Making something different out of something” 😃
unless you consider 9/11 nothing…in which case you are a terrorist and I’m callin dubbya! I smell terrorist on you boy…ya know what we called you back in the 60’s? communists! and i dunt like no commy not much eider!
-Cheater-
---
### Author:  [@HotRodKid](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/HotRodKid)
#### Post date: [July 22, 2005, 11:08am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/9-11-controlled-demolition/724/45 "2005-07-22T11:08:11Z")
> The Pearl Harbor conspiracy is still but a theory, but a commonly accepted
> theory. It’s your decision.
commonly accepted ? consiracy theorys are by nature only accepted as even POSSIBLE by a small % of the populatio
and um yea … the prez wouldnt have to allow such destrustion @ pearl harbor to gain the support of the public
fight off the JAp attack, minimize american caualties, and the public would STILL WIND UP JUST AS WILLING TO GO TO WAR
why remove the torpedo nets ? no reason to let the japs actualy destroy everything … just light some fires on the decks of the ships so it LOOKS like hell … intentionaly sink 3 or 4 of the most WORTHLESS ships in the harbor and the public will go just as crazy
send the most usefull ships out to sea and let the guys do some trap shooting off the decks, empty the other ships by giving everyone a long weekend … organize 100 games of football / baseball like 5 miles from the harbor for all the enlisted guys … why kill off the officers that your gonna need to put up a “proper” defense of the attack ?
but i bet that makes to much sense to fit the theories
---
### Author:  [@Bacon](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Bacon)
#### Post date: [July 22, 2005, 11:29am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/9-11-controlled-demolition/724/46 "2005-07-22T11:29:05Z")
Try changing the direction of a few million tons of metal. It aint’ easy not like it’s going to oh oh fuck this and turn 90 degrees. Chances are it’s going to crush what ever remaining structure is below it. 😉
---
### Author:  [@walter](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/walter)
#### Post date: [July 22, 2005, 11:30am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/9-11-controlled-demolition/724/47 "2005-07-22T11:30:00Z")
> [@FuzzyFish](#):
>
> Try changing the direction of a few million tons of metal. It aint’ easy not like it’s going to oh oh fuck this and turn 90 degrees. Chances are it’s going to crush what ever remaining structure is below it. 😉
You aren’t very good with units of measure are you?
[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/9-11-controlled-demolition/724.md?page=2)