# 912hp TT saleen

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/912hp-tt-saleen/179920>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [January 31, 2006, 7:02pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/912hp-tt-saleen/179920 "2006-01-31T19:02:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SonofaBish](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ad7895/32.png) [@SonofaBish](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SonofaBish)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2006, 11:18am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/912hp-tt-saleen/179920/21 "2006-02-02T11:18:14Z")

</div>

> [@shaggy](#):
>
> 03 saleen 425hp $59k  
> 11’s 1/4  
> [http://www.automobilemag.com/reviews/used/convertibles/0203\_saleen\_s281-e/](http://www.automobilemag.com/reviews/used/convertibles/0203_saleen_s281-e/)

well that there seems kinda good to me… 11’s outta 425 hp…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2006, 11:23am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/912hp-tt-saleen/179920/22 "2006-02-02T11:23:18Z")

</div>

59k:eek:. rather have a c5 vette, slower still looks better.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sinner6.0L](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/sinner6.0l/32/6016_2.png) [@Sinner6.0L](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Sinner6.0L)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2006, 1:47pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/912hp-tt-saleen/179920/23 "2006-02-02T13:47:09Z")

</div>

> [@shaggy](#):
>
> rather have a c5 vette, slower still looks better.

definitely

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/912hp-tt-saleen/179920.md?page=1)