# 93+Meth vs. C16.

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/93-meth-vs-c16/246676>\
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive\
**Created:** [September 9, 2009, 6:05am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/93-meth-vs-c16/246676 "2009-09-09T06:05:50Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![deadbeatrec](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/deadbeatrec/32/6401_2.png) [@deadbeatrec](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/deadbeatrec)\
**Post date:** [September 9, 2009, 6:37am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/93-meth-vs-c16/246676/4 "2009-09-09T06:37:34Z")

</div>

> [@FF: old skool Columbus Lindenberg piano](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ff-old-skool-columbus-lindenberg-piano/22757/2):
>
> Even with Meth, you will never see the boost levels C16 can attain.
> 
> They were running 12PSI on a procharged mustang…

11psi

meth cools more, is a lot cheaper, more readily available and easier to run

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/93-meth-vs-c16/246676)._