# 93+Meth vs. C16.

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/93-meth-vs-c16/246676>\
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive\
**Created:** [September 9, 2009, 6:05am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/93-meth-vs-c16/246676 "2009-09-09T06:05:50Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Boost\_Creep](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/boost_creep/32/6366_2.png) [@Boost\_Creep](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Boost_Creep)\
**Post date:** [September 9, 2009, 6:40am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/93-meth-vs-c16/246676/5 "2009-09-09T06:40:51Z")

</div>

> [@sho = ss, sho \> scooby](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/sho-ss-sho-scooby/22698/20):
>
> 11psi
> 
> meth cools more, is a lot cheaper, more readily available and easier to run

Yea, I’m not debating that. I’m asking if you can run 35PSI with 93/Meth? :lmao

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/93-meth-vs-c16/246676)._