# A new sub 4kn back protector

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/a-new-sub-4kn-back-protector/263489>\
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive\
**Created:** [April 22, 2012, 8:14pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/a-new-sub-4kn-back-protector/263489 "2012-04-22T20:14:46Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RocketPunch](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/rocketpunch/32/6429_2.png) [@RocketPunch](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/RocketPunch)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2012, 8:14pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/a-new-sub-4kn-back-protector/263489/1 "2012-04-22T20:14:46Z")

</div>

The Tyonic FEEL 3.7, Similarly priced with the Forcefield Sub4. These are the only two on the market that are CE2 and is rated at under 4KN. I like how the Tyonic can flex with the body from side to side and is tested to -20c for winter action sports. However, unlike the Forcefield, this is not reusable.

I might get their SEE+, which is CE2 but not sub 4kn, for street as I am shopping for one, that thing looks like it is very comfy and super light.

Not affiliated with revzilla, just wanted to share their video.

[ame][http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQjQtEQyB9g[/ame]](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQjQtEQyB9g%5B/ame%5D)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gundamzeppelin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/f4b2a3/32.png) [@Gundamzeppelin](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Gundamzeppelin)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2012, 12:31am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/a-new-sub-4kn-back-protector/263489/2 "2012-04-25T00:31:12Z")

</div>

it actually looks pretty sweet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Boxersix](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/boxersix/32/6327_2.png) [@Boxersix](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Boxersix)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2012, 4:15pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/a-new-sub-4kn-back-protector/263489/3 "2012-04-28T16:15:19Z")

</div>

I might be able to tolerate this one(comfort) actually given the side deflection allowance. I have a fucked up back to begin with and it makes wearing these things difficult for extended periods. A spine protector is definitely on the books for this year given that I’m looking to get gear together for a bike purchase in the future.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RocketPunch](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/rocketpunch/32/6429_2.png) [@RocketPunch](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/RocketPunch)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2012, 4:30pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/a-new-sub-4kn-back-protector/263489/4 "2012-04-28T16:30:37Z")

</div>

> [@internet sales tax??? WTF](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/internet-sales-tax-wtf/49371/23):
>
> I might be able to tolerate this one(comfort) actually given the side deflection allowance. I have a fucked up back to begin with and it makes wearing these things difficult for extended periods. A spine protector is definitely on the books for this year given that I’m looking to get gear together for a bike purchase in the future.

Take a look at their SEE+, that one got the smallest foot print I’ve seen for a CE2 protector, and that is the one I am consider for street in place of using the OEM CE insert that came with my jacket.

 ![http://i.imgur.com/brBKL.jpg](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/uploads/speedlife/original/3X/1/e/1eb25edf19b044f2a58bd7440ce437848c1f7228.jpeg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Boxersix](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/boxersix/32/6327_2.png) [@Boxersix](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Boxersix)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2012, 7:29pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/a-new-sub-4kn-back-protector/263489/5 "2012-04-28T19:29:13Z")

</div>

I’m going to look into this. I have to try one on before buying though. My spine is all fucked up from when I busted shit up during a snowboarding accident many years ago and now my shoulder blades dont sit the same.

footprint on safety gear never really bothers me comfort wise. A wider variant may actually be more comfortable if it doesn’t fall between my SB’s as much as a narrower version may. I had some spine gear for DH mounting biking in the past and it was narrow enough that i could pinch it between my shoulder blades during a hit and it would bruise the fucking shit out of me.

Someone offered to let me borrow a bike this summer for some riding fun, but I don’t have any gear to safely and comfortably(in a mental state) to just drive to his house tonight and take it home :’(

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RocketPunch](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/rocketpunch/32/6429_2.png) [@RocketPunch](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/RocketPunch)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2012, 8:35am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/a-new-sub-4kn-back-protector/263489/6 "2012-06-22T08:35:52Z")

</div>

I got my SEE+ yeaterday. Here is a quick review I posted on Revzilla.

> My only experience of back protectors are limited to my first one I got, Forcefield Sub-4, exclusive for track use. So I will mainly be comparing The Tryonic SEE+ to that.
> 
> Finally decided to replace all those level-1 “back protector” that came with my jackets for street use. I was looking for something light, with a slim profile and level-2 certified and the SEE+ seems to met all my criteria well. First thing I noticed about the SEE+ is how light it is and how the articulated design moves with my body well; Especially compare to my Sub-4 and because of that, the SEE+'s harness can be and is much more snug and form fitting. The harness is very well designed and provide lots of adjustability.
> 
> The hard-shell design works best if you are the kind of rider that wore back-protectors without a jacket (tsk-tsk). It provided some added puncture resistance and slide-ability but the trade off is being a hard-shell BP, it usually meant it is crash-and-trash kind of gear; in addition the gaps between the articulated parts might get caught on stuff when you are sliding on your back wondering “did that car just cut me off?” or “I knew I shouldn’t be pushing it so hard on my out lap”. Hey, but at least you don’t have to feel and look like you are wearing a rubber floor mat on your back. (cough _Forcefield_ cough).
> 
> While the level-2 rated at 7.7Kn might not be as low as the Forcefield Sub-4 or the FEEL 3.7, but it will be far superior than 99% of the stuff that came with your jacket. The low temp rating with be a feature that is unique to this line.
> 
> I think for the price of $150, it is a great product and provide some added insure to protect yourself from drivers that are “sharing” the road with you…ALL OF THEM.
> 
> Cliff notes:
> 
> - light and move with your body.
> - form fitting, great harness.
> - Does not feel like wearing a rubber floor mat.
> - hard-shell construction = crash-and-trash.
> - Take a look at Forcefield Sub-4 or Tryonic FEEL 3.7 for better Level-2 rating.

I would add, for a BP, cooling-wise it works pretty good albeit under a mesh jacket. My experience is it max cooling is when you are at low 1/2 to 3/4 tuck, that is when airflow being drawn out the most via the built-in channels on the body side of the BP to exhaust holes to the outside of the BP; the slimer profile helps. Just don’t expect it to feel like it is not there, at the end of the day, you ARE wearing a piece of EPS foam on you back.
