# Adam Corolla hints on Top Gear coming to History channel.

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/adam-corolla-hints-on-top-gear-coming-to-history-channel/250774>\
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive\
**Created:** [March 7, 2010, 2:31pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/adam-corolla-hints-on-top-gear-coming-to-history-channel/250774 "2010-03-07T14:31:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cossey](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/3ec8ea/32.png) [@Cossey](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Cossey)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2010, 6:01am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/adam-corolla-hints-on-top-gear-coming-to-history-channel/250774/8 "2010-03-08T06:01:46Z")

</div>

> [@Stay off my lawn!](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/stay-off-my-lawn/29870/12):
>
> You havent listened to the podcast, I suggest you do, he talked about the issue and adressed that fact. He also mention previous cases where shows sponsored by a certain brand have critiqued it without any penalties, the precedent had been set before and it could happen again. Keep in mind advertisers are aware of the age old rule that there is “no such thing as neative publicity” which is arguble but there is logic behind it.
> 
> It’s got potential to be good, not as good but good if the chemistry is right.

No such thing as negative publicity is very fail. Look at Tiger Woods. PERFECT example.

The advertising industry may say there’s no such thing, but the public relations industry says quite the contrary.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/adam-corolla-hints-on-top-gear-coming-to-history-channel/250774)._
