# After PRP...

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/after-prp/186026>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [November 3, 2006, 10:06pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/after-prp/186026 "2006-11-03T22:06:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 146

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2006, 6:12pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/after-prp/186026/146 "2006-11-12T18:12:45Z")

</div>

> [@hit and run... then some ownage LINK Edited!](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hit-and-run-then-some-ownage-link-edited/25751/24):
>
> im sorry but i dont see eye to eye with you on that one. to take time vs weight. what about horsepower #s and # of cyclinders?

its more impressive for a heavy vehicle to run equal or faster times then a vehicle thats lighter

and as for cylinders lets nto even go there since the fact that you add a power add that is a 100% of the stock rating of your motor then you just bascially doubled your cylinders. now do the same for a much large motor

IE… 140hp 1.8 litre now boost with 17psi [example] now makes 290 hp you just doubled your output just like doubling displacment

so take a take a 405 hp 5.7 and now boost it with 17psi [example] now makes 810hp you just did the same

anytime you double a motors output or triples it you are now similar to a NA larger cubed motor

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/after-prp/186026)._
