# After PRP... **URL:** \ **Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\ **Created:** [November 3, 2006, 10:06pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/after-prp/186026 "2006-11-03T22:06:00Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 69
**Author:** ![Laura00WS6](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/laura00ws6/32/6017_2.png) [@Laura00WS6](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Laura00WS6)\ **Post date:** [November 5, 2006, 7:59pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/after-prp/186026/69 "2006-11-05T19:59:32Z")
> [@Ever wonder who would win.](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ever-wonder-who-would-win/25600/15): > > you gotta hear me out on this one… i dont like gettin into this discussion cuz i know how u guys think but your thinkin abit off the way i am. its simple physics stuff really. > > its not the same power in the sense of peak power. but the same power to weight. you may be making near 400whp and his car making 270whp. but your truck weighs what…4000lbs? his tegra weighs what…2700lbs? > > Force = mass \* acceleration. or accleration = force/mass. you apply the same force to two objects…one lighter than the other, the force will move the smaller lighter object faster. > > thats all i’m saying. thats why the LS2 in a GTO is slower than the LS2 in the vette. vette is lighter. > > fwd cars are harder to launch than rwd cars. you know that. > if he goes 12.6 at 115, with a 2.1 60 foot on fwd, he could better that if his car was rwd cuz it will 60 foot better. weight transfers back…and on a fwd car, that is lifting weight off the tires…not good for traction. i seen drag radial fwd cars cuttin high 1.7 low 1.8 60s and running low 12’s at 115ish or w/e. a rwd car that would trap 115 would be cuttin 1.6 60’s and in the mid high 11’s easy > > this make any sense?? again a mechanical engineer giving theory out to someone that already knows. actually im 4600lbs and over 4 to wheels. hes like 2500 race weight and probably 270 to wheels. yes HP to weight duh but youre saing if he was RWD he woudl be faster see the issue is you cant just say that cause his platform isnt RWD adn going by mph doesnt mean shit like you think it does. everyone learned at a young age FWD sucked with big wheels. thats why they went to pedal bikes that are RWD. when you had your bigh wheel you didnt get traction what makes you think it will plant well now? so youre arguement is invalid. and youre theory does not apply in real life. also hes boosted big turbos will have a higher mph then a smaller turbo at same speed. look at that one dude that went the same ET and traps 130 if yout cant ET then who cares. ET is where its at MPH is for dyno queens --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/after-prp/186026)._