# Airmancam; 2006 Subaru STI **URL:** \ **Category:** Shift518 Automotive\ **Created:** [July 17, 2012, 3:49pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/airmancam-2006-subaru-sti/264417 "2012-07-17T15:49:39Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 6
**Author:** ![KillerBlackbird](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/killerblackbird/32/6525_2.png) [@KillerBlackbird](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/KillerBlackbird)\ **Post date:** [July 17, 2012, 5:14pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/airmancam-2006-subaru-sti/264417/6 "2012-07-17T17:14:11Z")
> [@FAWK. I've converted](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fawk-ive-converted/50145/41): > > While I’m not exactly sold on the kiddie playground background, and the very dark edited photos such as #9, 10 and 12 and the extreme low light close ups, the rest are superb. > > #1, 3, 7, 8, 19, 20 are :number1 > > Top 3 - #1. 3, 20. lol, Im not a fan of it either but it works. Not much in Warrensburg for locations lol. > [@Gas mileage thread](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gas-mileage-thread/50164/45): > > Theres that one effect I notice in A LOT of your images that I fucking love, and I will not lie… Ive been trying to figure out how to do it… and maybe tweak it for my own liking because I love it… > > and I cannot figure it out :banghead > > Anyways… I would choose first rig shot, seems like it has a bit more contrast to me and not as washed out > > One thing I notice your very good at, is making the most abstract photos look good such as number 4, if there was not a single other photo in this and you just showed it to some shmoe on the street, they would have no fucking clue what it is but it would still look good Thanks. Its actually really easy if its that purple/violet hue you are referring to. Im not crazy about the wheels being straight in number 6 but by the time they were turned in number 18 the sky/sun changed that quickly. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/airmancam-2006-subaru-sti/264417)._