# AMD Might Be Up For Sale...

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/amd-might-be-up-for-sale/28137>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [April 23, 2007, 2:38pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/amd-might-be-up-for-sale/28137 "2007-04-23T14:38:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 25

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RuBiCaNT](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/rubicant/32/7622_2.png) [@RuBiCaNT](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/RuBiCaNT)\
**Post date:** [April 24, 2007, 4:24pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/amd-might-be-up-for-sale/28137/25 "2007-04-24T16:24:42Z")

</div>

[quote=“boardjnky4,post:24,topic:28137"”]

dont those two links completely nullify ur argument in ur previous post, or am i mis-understanding something…

is AMD already integrating the on-chip memory controller?

isnt AMD still working with a 90nm chip?

[/quote]

:picard:

AMD has an integrated memory controller  
Intel does not have an integrated memory controller

AMD is converting to .065nm process technology  
Intel is converting to .045nm process technology

Intel is releasing the .045nm Penryn CPU to combat AMD’s .065nm Barcelona CPU.

Intel is moving towards an integrated memory controller and a new system bus architecture with the Nehalem

Currently, AMD has all the things that Intel is moving to ALREADY in their CPU’s. Intel has a superior process technology which is why they are still in the game as far as speed. Obviously there are other factors as to why Intel is faster but that is the bottom line.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/amd-might-be-up-for-sale/28137)._
