# Angryhero vs STI **URL:** \ **Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\ **Created:** [September 16, 2008, 5:16pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/angryhero-vs-sti/55044 "2008-09-16T17:16:34Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 8\ **Page:** 3
**Author:** ![chino](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/bcef8e/32.png) [@chino](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/chino)\ **Post date:** [September 19, 2008, 1:17pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/angryhero-vs-sti/55044/41 "2008-09-19T13:17:59Z")
> [@DeusExMachina](#): > > Unfortunately I don’t have an STi so I can’t prove it. The op should get his car dyno’d, or take it to a track instead of doing ricer fly-bys on the street. :shrug: meh, I was potentially with you until this post, that just makes you look dumb… you’re on your own now ---
**Author:** ![newman](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/newman/32/7569_2.png) [@newman](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/newman)\ **Post date:** [September 19, 2008, 1:21pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/angryhero-vs-sti/55044/42 "2008-09-19T13:21:42Z")
2.0 WRX has cats in the uppipe. They really hurt performance. Mike needs to input into this thread… ---
**Author:** ![DeusExMachina](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/deusexmachina/32/5036_2.png) [@DeusExMachina](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/DeusExMachina)\ **Post date:** [September 19, 2008, 1:37pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/angryhero-vs-sti/55044/43 "2008-09-19T13:37:45Z")
> [@chino](#): > > meh, I was potentially with you until this post, that just makes you look dumb… you’re on your own now Thats your call. Not sure what made me look dumb. I do have a WRX motor with the same mods except stock turbo @ 18psi in a GC8 (-400 lbs on a '02 WRX) and I’m not as fast as an STi. Haven’t tried it, though. I’m done in this thread as there’s a lot of leg humping and lack of common sense, so argue amongst yourselves. ---
**Author:** ![newman](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/newman/32/7569_2.png) [@newman](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/newman)\ **Post date:** [September 19, 2008, 1:40pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/angryhero-vs-sti/55044/44 "2008-09-19T13:40:40Z")
> [@DeusExMachina](#): > > Thats your call. Not sure what made me look dumb. > > I do have a WRX motor with the same mods except stock turbo @ 18psi in a GC8 (-400 lbs on a '02 WRX) and I’m not as fast as an STi. Haven’t tried it, though. > > I’m done in this thread as there’s a lot of leg humping and lack of common sense, so argue amongst yourselves. i don’t even know who the OP is, i’m not leghumping anyone… i just think you’re a little disillusioned… ---
**Author:** ![Slopoke](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/slopoke/32/7248_2.png) [@Slopoke](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Slopoke)\ **Post date:** [September 19, 2008, 1:53pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/angryhero-vs-sti/55044/45 "2008-09-19T13:53:50Z")
> [@DeusExMachina](#): > > You’re not going to get 80 AWHP from bolt ons, no matter the car. Sorry. :shrug: really i wont even waste my time with proven LS1 dyno’s or Audi’s with chipped pcm’s… ---
**Author:** ![Inn-Tune](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/inn-tune/32/7588_2.png) [@Inn-Tune](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Inn-Tune)\ **Post date:** [September 19, 2008, 2:17pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/angryhero-vs-sti/55044/46 "2008-09-19T14:17:57Z")
I tuned the car. He’s almost maxing the MAF out. The car runs great after the tune. I don’t doubt his story at all. The upgraded clutch slipped a bit on a few tuning pulls, but when it’s nice and cold it probably holds fine. I’m glad you’re having fun with it. 🙂 WRX’s with those mods generally run mid/high 12’s. STi’s with exhaust and no tune are generally low low 13’s. Those times assume good driving in both cars. ---
**Author:** ![AngryHero](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/angryhero/32/7495_2.png) [@AngryHero](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/AngryHero)\ **Post date:** [September 19, 2008, 3:15pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/angryhero-vs-sti/55044/47 "2008-09-19T15:15:14Z")
> [@DeusExMachina](#): > > Unfortunately I don’t have an STi so I can’t prove it. The op should get his car dyno’d, or take it to a track instead of doing ricer fly-bys on the street. :shrug: doing ricer flybys? How about, fuck you.You werent there.It was a clean solid run and we were both pretty pumped when we seen each others cars.How about you leave it at that. It rained last friday.The track was canceled. If you look you will see i posted in the thread about nyirp the very first friday after the tune. i believe your the douche that ragged about me in the original car thread for taking a chance with this car. This wrx(47k on motor) with the mods and tune cost only $8,000.I guess you cant beat that. > [@newman](#): > > 2.0 WRX has cats in the uppipe. They really hurt performance. > > Mike needs to input into this thread… Catless uppipe ftw > [@Inn-Tune](#): > > I tuned the car. He’s almost maxing the MAF out. The car runs great after the tune. I don’t doubt his story at all. The upgraded clutch slipped a bit on a few tuning pulls, but when it’s nice and cold it probably holds fine. > > I’m glad you’re having fun with it. 🙂 > > WRX’s with those mods generally run mid/high 12’s. STi’s with exhaust and no tune are generally low low 13’s. Those times assume good driving in both cars. Thanks mike the tune is great.The clutch hasent slipped at all.i even get better mpg’s now haha. ---
**Author:** ![EVOLUTION\_VIII\_MR](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/evolution_viii_mr/32/5187_2.png) [@EVOLUTION\_VIII\_MR](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/EVOLUTION_VIII_MR)\ **Post date:** [September 19, 2008, 4:21pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/angryhero-vs-sti/55044/48 "2008-09-19T16:21:34Z")
> [@Slopoke](#): > > does anyone on the board have a stock STI? Brent just get a vid and they will shut right up… blackturboneonII on here has a blue sti with a catback, fuel pump, intake and cobb. and is at stage one through cobb, he is waiting to install his downpipe so he can go stage two hes pretty stock so that would be the best chance > [@DeusExMachina](#): > > You’re not going to get 80 AWHP from bolt ons, no matter the car. Sorry. and thats not true at all my evo has a full exhaust, intake, and tune and a stock evo puts down about 220 awhp and after my tune im at about 300awhp [Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/angryhero-vs-sti/55044.md?page=2)