# Another STM stock-turbo monster
**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/another-stm-stock-turbo-monster/63178
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive
**Created:** [February 17, 2009, 11:07am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/another-stm-stock-turbo-monster/63178 "2009-02-17T11:07:10Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@4g63girl](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/4g63girl)
#### Post date: [February 17, 2009, 11:07am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/another-stm-stock-turbo-monster/63178/1 "2009-02-17T11:07:10Z")
[Click here to watch the video](http://user.streetfire.net/video/Kharis-Evo-VIII-on-STMs_636875.htm)
Stock turbo
93 octane
26 psi (tapering to 22)
Comp 272 cams
turbo back exhaust
Buschur FMIC
305 torque
296 power
(Once again, this is a MUSTANG dyno. For reference, a stock Viper makes 280 hp on this machine.)
Thanks again Khari- awesome car!
---
### Author:  [@BREETIME](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BREETIME)
#### Post date: [February 17, 2009, 11:09am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/another-stm-stock-turbo-monster/63178/2 "2009-02-17T11:09:11Z")
cool!
---
### Author:  [@justa4door](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/justa4door)
#### Post date: [February 17, 2009, 11:12am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/another-stm-stock-turbo-monster/63178/3 "2009-02-17T11:12:09Z")
that dnyo chart looks like a good clean run
---
### Author:  [@Minglor](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Minglor)
#### Post date: [February 17, 2009, 11:34am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/another-stm-stock-turbo-monster/63178/4 "2009-02-17T11:34:17Z")
> [@4g63girl"](#):
>
> (Once again, this is a MUSTANG dyno. For reference, a stock Viper makes 280 hp on this machine.)
Just wonder what viper. (year/trim)
I know power claims for vipers range between 400-6 something.
Just to put things into perspective.
---
### Author:  [@justa4door](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/justa4door)
#### Post date: [February 17, 2009, 11:38am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/another-stm-stock-turbo-monster/63178/5 "2009-02-17T11:38:32Z")
can you enlighten me on the fact you keep pointing out that this is a “MUSTANG”
---
### Author:  [@Minglor](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Minglor)
#### Post date: [February 17, 2009, 11:41am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/another-stm-stock-turbo-monster/63178/6 "2009-02-17T11:41:06Z")
> [@justa4door](#):
>
> can you enlighten me on the fact you keep pointing out that this is a “MUSTANG”
[http://lmgtfy.com/?q=mustang+dyno+vs+dynojet](http://lmgtfy.com/?q=mustang+dyno+vs+dynojet)
I was wondering myself.
Some people even say the mustang dyno reads 25% lower than dynojet…but that number varies.
---
### Author:  [@Emery](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Emery)
#### Post date: [February 17, 2009, 11:41am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/another-stm-stock-turbo-monster/63178/7 "2009-02-17T11:41:57Z")
Mustang dynos read very low compared to others.
I believe it was a stock 93-94 viper.
-Em
---
### Author:  [@justa4door](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/justa4door)
#### Post date: [February 17, 2009, 11:46am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/another-stm-stock-turbo-monster/63178/8 "2009-02-17T11:46:17Z")
ok then why would one pick up a mustang over a jet… is it the cost?? not to hate but really i dont get it
---
### Author:  [@Minglor](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Minglor)
#### Post date: [February 17, 2009, 11:47am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/another-stm-stock-turbo-monster/63178/9 "2009-02-17T11:47:11Z")
> [@EmeryatSTM](#):
>
> Mustang dynos read very low compared to others.
>
> I believe it was a stock 93-94 viper.
>
> -Em
I am just pumped for all the dyno posts and would love to see a drag day or dyno day or something…
---
### Author:  [@articzap](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/articzap)
#### Post date: [February 17, 2009, 11:48am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/another-stm-stock-turbo-monster/63178/10 "2009-02-17T11:48:26Z")
Most people say Mustang dynos read 12-15% less then a Dynojet.
So that Evo would make 341 hp on a Dynojet by calculations, but it’s just that, a calculation.
---
### Author:  [@dreid](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/dreid)
#### Post date: [February 17, 2009, 11:56am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/another-stm-stock-turbo-monster/63178/11 "2009-02-17T11:56:08Z")
you guys and gals are making me want a evo
---
### Author:  [@4g63girl](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/4g63girl)
#### Post date: [February 17, 2009, 11:57am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/another-stm-stock-turbo-monster/63178/12 "2009-02-17T11:57:44Z")
The Mustang Dynamometers are the most accurate machines out of the bunch. The rollers actually load vehicle weight against the tires, so the car HAS to pull it’s own weight compared to just going wide open throttle on a free spinning roller.
The dyno gives us real driving conditions and true load cells. Much more efficient for tuning and monitoring.
It’s not that the mustang dyno’s read lower… it’s that all the other dyno’s read higher 🙂
---
### Author:  [@Emery](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Emery)
#### Post date: [February 17, 2009, 12:03pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/another-stm-stock-turbo-monster/63178/13 "2009-02-17T12:03:16Z")
It all comes down to the calibrations in the dyno. So many people mess with them and get the numbers to read closer to a dynojet. We will leave ours alone.
The reason we picked our dyno over a dynojet is it just works better for our application. It has load features that the dyno jet just doesn’t have. I like to think the mustang is closer to the real number and doesn’t inflate numbers just to make the customer happy.
All and all, It its just a tool for reference while tuning. At the end of the day the score board at the end of the track is all that matters.
-Em
---
### Author:  [@khoveraki](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/khoveraki)
#### Post date: [February 17, 2009, 2:43pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/another-stm-stock-turbo-monster/63178/14 "2009-02-17T14:43:41Z")
Awesome runs, all of your evos are badass. Are you going to run AI at that psi? If not when do you run meth or at least water on stock turbo for evos?
---
### Author:  [@Saxon](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Saxon)
#### Post date: [February 17, 2009, 3:18pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/another-stm-stock-turbo-monster/63178/15 "2009-02-17T15:18:30Z")
> [@EmeryatSTM](#):
>
> All and all, It its just a tool for reference while tuning. At the end of the day the score board at the end of the track is all that matters.
>
> -Em
very true, people can make dyno’s put out more or less by messing around with the settings, but the mph tells all
you guys are just pumping out the cars up there, how about after i get tuned on a dynapack i come up there and do a run to see how they compare :tup:
---
### Author:  [@Toda\_Party](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Toda_Party)
#### Post date: [February 17, 2009, 4:02pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/another-stm-stock-turbo-monster/63178/16 "2009-02-17T16:02:00Z")
comparing dynos is useless, pointless, and soooooo old.
just don’t even bother comparing numbers.
u can even post 3 charts of the same car on a dynojet and the #'s would be different everytime.
it would’ve been nice to see a before(stock) vs after cuz thats all a dyno is really good for.
u are right about one thing…MPH does tell it all
---
### Author:  [@letitroll](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/letitroll)
#### Post date: [February 17, 2009, 4:06pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/another-stm-stock-turbo-monster/63178/17 "2009-02-17T16:06:43Z")
Did you do a 1/4 mile run on that car? seems to be a comparible setup to my old evo and I’d like to see what it should run in the 1/4.
---
### Author:  [@TrueBlue](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/TrueBlue)
#### Post date: [February 18, 2009, 6:05am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/another-stm-stock-turbo-monster/63178/18 "2009-02-18T06:05:24Z")
> [@dreid](#):
>
> you guys and gals are making me want a evo
Fo’ serious. That and letitroll’s old red car with the gold wheels, yuuuuuuuuuuum :tup:
---
### Author:  [@psphinx81](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/psphinx81)
#### Post date: [February 18, 2009, 6:47am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/another-stm-stock-turbo-monster/63178/19 "2009-02-18T06:47:51Z")
:tup:
---
### Author:  [@Beck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Beck)
#### Post date: [February 18, 2009, 10:10am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/another-stm-stock-turbo-monster/63178/20 "2009-02-18T10:10:18Z")
is this adam’s old car? (sureshot!)