# Anyone have dyno results of no crossover vs x/h-pipe?

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/anyone-have-dyno-results-of-no-crossover-vs-x-h-pipe/192783
**Category:** PittSpeed Automotive
**Created:** [October 3, 2007, 10:05am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/anyone-have-dyno-results-of-no-crossover-vs-x-h-pipe/192783 "2007-10-03T10:05:45Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 15

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![T34418L31](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/e56c9b/32.png) [@T34418L31](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/T34418L31)
#### Post date: [October 3, 2007, 10:01pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/anyone-have-dyno-results-of-no-crossover-vs-x-h-pipe/192783/15 "2007-10-03T22:01:49Z")

</div>

LMAO thanks, but I know what the differences, pros, and cons are. I’ve spent some time searching LS1Tech, and have gotten every answer except this one.

> [@FS: 1998 V8 Taurus SHO](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-1998-v8-taurus-sho/32389/5):
>
> Thanks for the link redneck, but I was trying to find a no crossover vs crossover dyno. The popular consensus is to run a crossover, but no one can tell me what power loss, if any, is had from not using a crossover of any kind.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/anyone-have-dyno-results-of-no-crossover-vs-x-h-pipe/192783)._