# Ask Quik

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ask-quik/169761>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [October 12, 2004, 3:13pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ask-quik/169761 "2004-10-12T15:13:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2004, 8:29pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ask-quik/169761/41 "2004-10-13T20:29:06Z")

</div>

> [@fstcmaroz28](#):
>
> still owe me a race

I Owe

YOU! 🤣 🤣

🤣

🤣

🤣

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SloWhite\_Z](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/slowhite_z/32/5969_2.png) [@SloWhite\_Z](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SloWhite_Z)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2004, 8:35pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ask-quik/169761/42 "2004-10-13T20:35:38Z")

</div>

YEAH OWE ME:squint: :mullet: out and down until next summer

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2004, 8:38pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ask-quik/169761/43 "2004-10-13T20:38:36Z")

</div>

by then my rearend wont be broke anymore 🤣  
I wanted to spank you:naughty: with 2.73’s and a 1 wheel peeler :kekegay:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SloWhite\_Z](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/slowhite_z/32/5969_2.png) [@SloWhite\_Z](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SloWhite_Z)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2004, 8:41pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ask-quik/169761/44 "2004-10-13T20:41:05Z")

</div>

> [@SHAG](#):
>
> by then my rearend wont be broke anymore 🤣  
> I wanted to spank you:naughty: with 2.73’s and a 1 wheel peeler :kekegay:

weirdo :greddy:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2004, 8:43pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ask-quik/169761/45 "2004-10-13T20:43:56Z")

</div>

> [@BlkP42E](#):
>
> we are going to settle the long awaited battle now:
> 
> Dear Quilk,
> 
> I was wondering if you could let us know which is the better engine, the LT1 or the 302.
> 
> Thanks,  
> Confused

well actually, the lt1 isnt nothing more then a oldstyle 350 sbc with revised heads and cam. the heads use a reveresed cooled design unlike the tradiontal heads for sbcs. they also use a opti spark that is one of hte weaker points of that style motor. but like any typical 350 with around 100,000 miles its starts to really see problems. unlike the short stroke large bore of the 302 it still a stable hard working motor with not to many problems. it see alot more mileage without as much problems. the 302 does relate back to the trusty 289. alot of parts from the 289 are interchangable with the modern 302. now in 87 thru 92 this motor was a strong and reliable candiate. it had no problem accepting boost or spray. in 93 they changed the pistons which werent as strong as previous years. from 93 to 95 they were the same motors. now saying the 302 is a better engine to the Lt1. well they both are reliable motors but advantage goes to ford. knowing you can beat the hell outof it and it still runs strong. unlike any 350 with enough beating it gives up to easily. reason why you see alot more lt1s lying around in junkyards. now with a 87 to 92 stang and a 93 to 97 lt1 fbody. i would have to give the advantage to the mustang. one the stang is alot lighter even the heavy pig of gt is ligther then teh fbody. now the first year 4th gear was horrbily a dog. stang still owend then nicely. now giving manual versus manual its all in the driver most fbody owners cant see anyways since their mullet is in their way fo vision. or that they are staring at the buisness up front and party in the rear look of a mullet in the mirror os they sleep at the light and get spankekd like always. now a stang owner sees the girl at the end is knowing he is going ot get her since the mustang has always been the favorite of the classy ladies and hte fbody is the favorite of the trailer park girls. so in the end a 302\>LT1

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2004, 8:45pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ask-quik/169761/46 "2004-10-13T20:45:11Z")

</div>

hey theres alot of tralier chick hotties out there :naughty:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BlkP42E](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/blkp42e/32/5938_2.png) [@BlkP42E](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BlkP42E)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2004, 9:09pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ask-quik/169761/47 "2004-10-13T21:09:22Z")

</div>

> [@Quik](#):
>
> well actually, the lt1 isnt nothing more then a oldstyle 350 sbc with revised heads and cam. the heads use a reveresed cooled design unlike the tradiontal heads for sbcs. they also use a opti spark that is one of hte weaker points of that style motor. but like any typical 350 with around 100,000 miles its starts to really see problems. unlike the short stroke large bore of the 302 it still a stable hard working motor with not to many problems. it see alot more mileage without as much problems. the 302 does relate back to the trusty 289. alot of parts from the 289 are interchangable with the modern 302. now in 87 thru 92 this motor was a strong and reliable candiate. it had no problem accepting boost or spray. in 93 they changed the pistons which werent as strong as previous years. from 93 to 95 they were the same motors. now saying the 302 is a better engine to the Lt1. well they both are reliable motors but advantage goes to ford. knowing you can beat the hell outof it and it still runs strong. unlike any 350 with enough beating it gives up to easily. reason why you see alot more lt1s lying around in junkyards. now with a 87 to 92 stang and a 93 to 97 lt1 fbody. i would have to give the advantage to the mustang. one the stang is alot lighter even the heavy pig of gt is ligther then teh fbody. now the first year 4th gear was horrbily a dog. stang still owend then nicely. now giving manual versus manual its all in the driver most fbody owners cant see anyways since their mullet is in their way fo vision. or that they are staring at the buisness up front and party in the rear look of a mullet in the mirror os they sleep at the light and get spankekd like always. now a stang owner sees the girl at the end is knowing he is going ot get her since the mustang has always been the favorite of the classy ladies and hte fbody is the favorite of the trailer park girls. so in the end a 302\>LT1

:bowdown:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2004, 9:13pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ask-quik/169761/48 "2004-10-13T21:13:05Z")

</div>

> [@BlkP42E](#):
>
> :bowdown:

your welcome

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Streetnstrip](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/7bcc69/32.png) [@Streetnstrip](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Streetnstrip)\
**Post date:** [October 14, 2004, 1:17am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ask-quik/169761/49 "2004-10-14T01:17:21Z")

</div>

> [@Quik](#):
>
> well actually, the lt1 isnt nothing more then a oldstyle 350 sbc with revised heads and cam. the heads use a reveresed cooled design unlike the tradiontal heads for sbcs. they also use a opti spark that is one of hte weaker points of that style motor. but like any typical 350 with around 100,000 miles its starts to really see problems. unlike the short stroke large bore of the 302 it still a stable hard working motor with not to many problems. it see alot more mileage without as much problems. the 302 does relate back to the trusty 289. alot of parts from the 289 are interchangable with the modern 302. now in 87 thru 92 this motor was a strong and reliable candiate. it had no problem accepting boost or spray. in 93 they changed the pistons which werent as strong as previous years. from 93 to 95 they were the same motors. now saying the 302 is a better engine to the Lt1. well they both are reliable motors but advantage goes to ford. knowing you can beat the hell outof it and it still runs strong. unlike any 350 with enough beating it gives up to easily. reason why you see alot more lt1s lying around in junkyards. now with a 87 to 92 stang and a 93 to 97 lt1 fbody. i would have to give the advantage to the mustang. one the stang is alot lighter even the heavy pig of gt is ligther then teh fbody. now the first year 4th gear was horrbily a dog. stang still owend then nicely. now giving manual versus manual its all in the driver most fbody owners cant see anyways since their mullet is in their way fo vision. or that they are staring at the buisness up front and party in the rear look of a mullet in the mirror os they sleep at the light and get spankekd like always. now a stang owner sees the girl at the end is knowing he is going ot get her since the mustang has always been the favorite of the classy ladies and hte fbody is the favorite of the trailer park girls. so in the end a 302\>LT1

jeeves has spoken :bowrofl:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Turbo\_Silverado](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/turbo_silverado/32/5990_2.png) [@Turbo\_Silverado](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Turbo_Silverado)\
**Post date:** [October 14, 2004, 4:30am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ask-quik/169761/50 "2004-10-14T04:30:20Z")

</div>

> [@Quik](#):
>
> well actually, the lt1 isnt nothing more then a oldstyle 350 sbc with revised heads and cam. the heads use a reveresed cooled design unlike the tradiontal heads for sbcs. they also use a opti spark that is one of hte weaker points of that style motor. but like any typical 350 with around 100,000 miles its starts to really see problems. unlike the short stroke large bore of the 302 it still a stable hard working motor with not to many problems. it see alot more mileage without as much problems. the 302 does relate back to the trusty 289. alot of parts from the 289 are interchangable with the modern 302. now in 87 thru 92 this motor was a strong and reliable candiate. it had no problem accepting boost or spray. in 93 they changed the pistons which werent as strong as previous years. from 93 to 95 they were the same motors. now saying the 302 is a better engine to the Lt1. well they both are reliable motors but advantage goes to ford. knowing you can beat the hell outof it and it still runs strong. unlike any 350 with enough beating it gives up to easily. reason why you see alot more lt1s lying around in junkyards. now with a 87 to 92 stang and a 93 to 97 lt1 fbody. i would have to give the advantage to the mustang. one the stang is alot lighter even the heavy pig of gt is ligther then teh fbody. now the first year 4th gear was horrbily a dog. stang still owend then nicely. now giving manual versus manual its all in the driver most fbody owners cant see anyways since their mullet is in their way fo vision. or that they are staring at the buisness up front and party in the rear look of a mullet in the mirror os they sleep at the light and get spankekd like always. now a stang owner sees the girl at the end is knowing he is going ot get her since the mustang has always been the favorite of the classy ladies and hte fbody is the favorite of the trailer park girls. so in the end a LT1\>302

That seems better

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BlkP42E](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/blkp42e/32/5938_2.png) [@BlkP42E](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BlkP42E)\
**Post date:** [October 14, 2004, 5:01am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ask-quik/169761/51 "2004-10-14T05:01:31Z")

</div>

> [@95greenZ](#):
>
> That seems better

you aren’t Quik, therefore your opinion has no validity. Quik says 302\>LT1, so be it; he is the oh so wise one

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pewter](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/pewter/32/5936_2.png) [@Pewter](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Pewter)\
**Post date:** [October 14, 2004, 5:05am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ask-quik/169761/52 "2004-10-14T05:05:56Z")

</div>

not

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dappie99](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/57b2e6/32.png) [@dappie99](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/dappie99)\
**Post date:** [October 14, 2004, 5:13am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ask-quik/169761/53 "2004-10-14T05:13:07Z")

</div>

> [@8.1crew](#):
>
> not

ur just mad b/c god (quik) just said ur motors r :greddy2: :mullet:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Turbo\_Silverado](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/turbo_silverado/32/5990_2.png) [@Turbo\_Silverado](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Turbo_Silverado)\
**Post date:** [October 14, 2004, 5:14am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ask-quik/169761/54 "2004-10-14T05:14:33Z")

</div>

> [@BlkP42E](#):
>
> you aren’t Quik, therefore your opinion has no validity. Quik says 302\>LT1, so be it; he is the oh so wise one

im am soo sorry i know i must :bowdown: :bowdown: :bowdown: to quick

:bowdown::bowdown::bowdown::bowdown::bowdown::bowdown::bowdown::bowdown:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pewter](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/pewter/32/5936_2.png) [@Pewter](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Pewter)\
**Post date:** [October 14, 2004, 5:17am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ask-quik/169761/55 "2004-10-14T05:17:04Z")

</div>

> [@dappie99](#):
>
> ur just mad b/c god (quik) just said ur motors r :greddy2: :mullet:

LS1 is the motor!!!nuff said !!!GM gen III\>\*

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dappie99](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/57b2e6/32.png) [@dappie99](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/dappie99)\
**Post date:** [October 14, 2004, 5:20am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ask-quik/169761/56 "2004-10-14T05:20:02Z")

</div>

:blah: :tounge:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pewter](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/pewter/32/5936_2.png) [@Pewter](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Pewter)\
**Post date:** [October 14, 2004, 5:21am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ask-quik/169761/57 "2004-10-14T05:21:30Z")

</div>

> [@dappie99](#):
>
> :blah: :tounge:

:tounge: this

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![oneslowbowtie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/d78d45/32.png) [@oneslowbowtie](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/oneslowbowtie)\
**Post date:** [October 14, 2004, 5:51am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ask-quik/169761/58 "2004-10-14T05:51:32Z")

</div>

> [@Quik](#):
>
> well actually, the lt1 isnt nothing more then a oldstyle 350 sbc with revised heads and cam. the heads use a reveresed cooled design unlike the tradiontal heads for sbcs. they also use a opti spark that is one of hte weaker points of that style motor. but like any typical 350 with around 100,000 miles its starts to really see problems. unlike the short stroke large bore of the 302 it still a stable hard working motor with not to many problems. it see alot more mileage without as much problems. the 302 does relate back to the trusty 289. alot of parts from the 289 are interchangable with the modern 302. now in 87 thru 92 this motor was a strong and reliable candiate. it had no problem accepting boost or spray. in 93 they changed the pistons which werent as strong as previous years. from 93 to 95 they were the same motors. now saying the 302 is a better engine to the Lt1. well they both are reliable motors but advantage goes to ford. knowing you can beat the hell outof it and it still runs strong. unlike any 350 with enough beating it gives up to easily. reason why you see alot more lt1s lying around in junkyards. now with a 87 to 92 stang and a 93 to 97 lt1 fbody. i would have to give the advantage to the mustang. one the stang is alot lighter even the heavy pig of gt is ligther then teh fbody. now the first year 4th gear was horrbily a dog. stang still owend then nicely. now giving manual versus manual its all in the driver most fbody owners cant see anyways since their mullet is in their way fo vision. or that they are staring at the buisness up front and party in the rear look of a mullet in the mirror os they sleep at the light and get spankekd like always. now a stang owner sees the girl at the end is knowing he is going ot get her since the mustang has always been the favorite of the classy ladies and hte fbody is the favorite of the trailer park girls. so in the end a 302\>LT1

please dont believe anything you say please I want you to pay me for 1 minute of my life cause I had to read that bullshit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\
**Post date:** [October 14, 2004, 2:11pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ask-quik/169761/59 "2004-10-14T14:11:14Z")

</div>

🤣 @ this thread

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gray05](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/cc9497/32.png) [@Gray05](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Gray05)\
**Post date:** [October 14, 2004, 2:13pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ask-quik/169761/60 "2004-10-14T14:13:23Z")

</div>

> [@8.1crew](#):
>
> LS1 is the motor!!!nuff said !!!GM gen III\>\*

GM Gen IV \> GM Gen III 😉

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ask-quik/169761.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ask-quik/169761.md?page=4)
