# Aston Martin 77 - $1.8M???

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/aston-martin-77-1-8m/208343>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [January 19, 2011, 8:29pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/aston-martin-77-1-8m/208343 "2011-01-19T20:29:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![klug](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/klug/32/5222_2.png) [@klug](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/klug)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2011, 8:20pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/aston-martin-77-1-8m/208343/21 "2011-01-20T20:20:46Z")

</div>

> [@purestock240](#):
>
> all of these crazy materials they use and spend millions of $ on research and this car still weighs a whopping 3,306 pounds.  
> seems like they are working backwards with the research, my 240 is down to \<2400lbs.

lol apples and bananas

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rdandy5875](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/rdandy5875/32/7511_2.png) [@rdandy5875](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/rdandy5875)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2011, 8:21pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/aston-martin-77-1-8m/208343/22 "2011-01-20T20:21:47Z")

</div>

Yeah but you stopped short with the math. Sure their car weighs 900 pounds more than yours, but it’s worth 1.399999999999999999 MILLION pounds more = AM wins

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![purestock240](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/purestock240/32/5729_2.png) [@purestock240](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/purestock240)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2011, 8:33pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/aston-martin-77-1-8m/208343/23 "2011-01-20T20:33:50Z")

</div>

exactly, it costs 1500x more. and its still heavier. isnt the whole point of these expensive “light weight” materials to make the car lighter.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![klug](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/klug/32/5222_2.png) [@klug](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/klug)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2011, 8:41pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/aston-martin-77-1-8m/208343/24 "2011-01-20T20:41:36Z")

</div>

capt picard.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ughson](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/e0b2c6/32.png) [@ughson](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ughson)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2011, 12:49pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/aston-martin-77-1-8m/208343/25 "2011-01-21T12:49:28Z")

</div>

> [@purestock240](#):
>
> exactly, it costs 1500x more. and its still heavier. isnt the whole point of these expensive “light weight” materials to make the car lighter.

Actualy to reduce chassis flex… you got to realize the car has alot of extra features you need to accound for like 8 more cylanders

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LAFENGAS](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/lafengas/32/7573_2.png) [@LAFENGAS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/LAFENGAS)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2011, 12:59pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/aston-martin-77-1-8m/208343/26 "2011-01-21T12:59:44Z")

</div>

kinda pissed i couldn’t make it to this event lastnite…but the rear on the Aston reminds of the new ferrari 458…but only in this pic. lol :

![http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/hs278.snc6/180678_1818936391526_1183629515_32111551_3525883_n.jpg](http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/hs278.snc6/180678_1818936391526_1183629515_32111551_3525883_n.jpg)

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/aston-martin-77-1-8m/208343.md?page=1)