# attn Domantion **URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/attn-domantion/185885 **Category:** PittSpeed Automotive **Created:** [October 28, 2006, 2:02pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/attn-domantion/185885 "2006-10-28T14:02:45Z") **Posts on this page:** 1 **Showing post:** 108
### Author: ![Turbo\_Silverado](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/turbo_silverado/32/5990_2.png) [@Turbo\_Silverado](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Turbo_Silverado) #### Post date: [February 3, 2007, 4:50am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/attn-domantion/185885/108 "2007-02-03T04:50:28Z")
> [@Tire question, Faulkin FK-451](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tire-question-faulkin-fk-451/26428/8): > > I kinda am bummed that the dyno graph we got didn’t show more gains than what they did. Especially when ignoramouses tried to take me down a notch because the fraternity of LSx is so sophisticated that little old me could never understand the complexity of the marvel. > > On a side note, The AF was 13.5 and I’m uncertian what the timing was. Perhaps the mail order tuner wasn’t anticipating the flow improvement and its getting alot more air in than he accounted for. We could get more aggressive with the tune and pick up probably another 75-200hp. well the AF is kinda lean, u want a nice 12.7 or 12.8 on these cars. “bummed that the dyno graph we go didnt show more gains than what they did”…wtf does that mean??? come on, the dyno shows what you got, u didnt get more or less than what the dyno shows… more aggeresive with the tune and get 200 hp??? :bowrofl: :bowrofl: :bowrofl: :bowrofl: :bowrofl: :bowrofl: :bowrofl: :bowrofl: :bowrofl: :bowrofl: :bowrofl: :bowrofl: :bowrofl: :bowrofl: :bowrofl: :bowrofl: :bowrofl: :bowrofl: :bowrofl: :bowrofl: :bowrofl: :bowrofl: :bowrofl: :bowrofl: --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/attn-domantion/185885)._