# Automotive Photography Thread.

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/automotive-photography-thread/248715>\
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive\
**Created:** [November 30, 2009, 6:17pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/automotive-photography-thread/248715 "2009-11-30T18:17:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 45

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![94Gt5.0](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/94gt5.0/32/6377_2.png) [@94Gt5.0](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/94Gt5.0)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2009, 6:38pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/automotive-photography-thread/248715/45 "2009-12-01T18:38:52Z")

</div>

> [@hahaha WAY2SLOW found your old Eclipse](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hahaha-way2slow-found-your-old-eclipse/26608/2):
>
> All look like amateur point and shoot shots, especially the first, with the last looking the best. At least an ounce of photography in the last one was used.
> 
> Do you _not see_ the difference in quality between most shots posted here and those?
> 
> It’s not about the _car_ looking good, but the **shot** looking good, even if it’s a shitty car!

Dude, then wtf is this pic:

That had NOTHING said about it, and looks like a 1980 throw away camera. Seriously people need to get off my fucking back for posts. Shits stupid. :Idiots

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/automotive-photography-thread/248715)._