# BAS not like dyno results - he disagrees with dyno

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bas-not-like-dyno-results-he-disagrees-with-dyno/121080>\
**Category:** SON240sx Off Topic\
**Created:** [January 11, 2009, 7:27pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bas-not-like-dyno-results-he-disagrees-with-dyno/121080 "2009-01-11T19:27:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 20

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bing](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/bing/32/7211_2.png) [@bing](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bing)\
**Post date:** [January 11, 2009, 8:54pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bas-not-like-dyno-results-he-disagrees-with-dyno/121080/20 "2009-01-11T20:54:52Z")

</div>

> [@Whos breath smells????](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/whos-breath-smells/19830/32):
>
> . lol and how would you, (with all your glorious food management college classes under your belt), know if I had already done anti reversion work or not … ( he says as he looks at the original race tech article on anti reversion from 4 years ago )… it’s WRONG, no matter what you say, or how you try to twist it… it’s WRONG… lol.

if it achieved every objective he set out to achieve it is uncategorically right.

YOU are wrong…

again.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bas-not-like-dyno-results-he-disagrees-with-dyno/121080)._