# Battlefield: Bad Company 2 **URL:** \ **Category:** Shift518 Off Topic\ **Created:** [March 6, 2010, 9:50am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/battlefield-bad-company-2/250739 "2010-03-06T09:50:31Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 5
**Author:** ![Shady](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/6de8d8/32.png) [@Shady](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shady)\ **Post date:** [March 6, 2010, 3:14pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/battlefield-bad-company-2/250739/5 "2010-03-06T15:14:43Z")
> [@Aiya, I totally sold out to daily driver comfort](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/aiya-i-totally-sold-out-to-daily-driver-comfort/29641/107): > > What’s better than those two? Medal of Honor? > > I’m not comparing them to great FPS’s of the 90’s or early 2000’s. **You can’t compare these games to those just because the graphics have changed so much.** As far as modern FPS’s released in the last 3 or 4 years, both of these take the cake. In my opinion. False Graphics means nothing when it comes to a game in itself, you can have a game be completely epic looking and have it still absoloutely suck. I would rather play quite a few games from the late 90’s early 2000’s with shitty graphics than some of these new titles that are comming out. And if your going to play that card, than Crysis still beats both of these --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/battlefield-bad-company-2/250739)._