# Bob Lutz: Global Warming a "total crock of sh\*t" **URL:** \ **Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\ **Created:** [February 13, 2008, 11:50pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bob-lutz-global-warming-a-total-crock-of-sh-t/43421 "2008-02-13T23:50:12Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 8\ **Page:** 2
**Author:** ![Toda\_Party](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/toda_party/32/7354_2.png) [@Toda\_Party](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Toda_Party)\ **Post date:** [February 14, 2008, 10:50am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bob-lutz-global-warming-a-total-crock-of-sh-t/43421/21 "2008-02-14T10:50:47Z")
> [@Nikuk](#): > > Invade oil rich countries :gotme: YEEEE HAWWWW BOY, I SEE DAT DEM DURRR OSSSAAAA MAAWWW FELLER! GETTUM! ---
**Author:** ![SoloIIscoob](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/35a633/32.png) [@SoloIIscoob](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SoloIIscoob)\ **Post date:** [February 14, 2008, 9:05pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bob-lutz-global-warming-a-total-crock-of-sh-t/43421/22 "2008-02-14T21:05:37Z")
> [@JayS](#): > > What was the easy answer again? hydrogen=the answer [http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1400360016821042640&q=hydrogen+combustion+engine&total=64&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0](http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1400360016821042640&q=hydrogen+combustion+engine&total=64&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0) Larsen Hydrogen Engine [http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4858425412744522460&q=hydrogen+engine&total=384&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=4](http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4858425412744522460&q=hydrogen+engine&total=384&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=4) 300hp/900tq^^ opposed8 banks turn off power instantaneous siqqq ---
**Author:** ![LXIFLYBY](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/lxiflyby/32/7399_2.png) [@LXIFLYBY](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/LXIFLYBY)\ **Post date:** [February 15, 2008, 1:54pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bob-lutz-global-warming-a-total-crock-of-sh-t/43421/23 "2008-02-15T13:54:15Z")
you do realize that there is no easy way to produce hydrogen in large amounts, its either from using fossil fuels or electrolysis with water. Therefore hydrogen=not the answer ---
**Author:** ![Violator](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/violator/32/7278_2.png) [@Violator](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Violator)\ **Post date:** [February 15, 2008, 2:13pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bob-lutz-global-warming-a-total-crock-of-sh-t/43421/24 "2008-02-15T14:13:50Z")
> [@LXIFLYBY](#): > > you do realize that there is no easy way to produce hydrogen in large amounts, its either from using fossil fuels or electrolysis with water. Therefore hydrogen=not the answer YET. Being one of the most abundant elements, it is a superb choice and a matter of time before a system is developed. ---
**Author:** ![eMKay](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/emkay/32/7428_2.png) [@eMKay](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/eMKay)\ **Post date:** [February 15, 2008, 2:23pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bob-lutz-global-warming-a-total-crock-of-sh-t/43421/25 "2008-02-15T14:23:49Z")
> [@LXIFLYBY](#): > > you do realize that there is no easy way to produce hydrogen in large amounts, its either from using fossil fuels or electrolysis with water. Therefore hydrogen=not the answer Hydrogen + Fusion = Answer. And Lutz is wrong, him and Bedard need to go suck eachother’s dicks. ---
**Author:** ![ultradriver10000](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/ultradriver10000/32/7397_2.png) [@ultradriver10000](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ultradriver10000)\ **Post date:** [February 15, 2008, 5:28pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bob-lutz-global-warming-a-total-crock-of-sh-t/43421/26 "2008-02-15T17:28:15Z")
![http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d44/blackenroe/inyourface.jpg](http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d44/blackenroe/inyourface.jpg) Balls ---
**Author:** ![double\_j](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/double_j/32/7380_2.png) [@double\_j](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/double_j)\ **Post date:** [February 15, 2008, 9:19pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bob-lutz-global-warming-a-total-crock-of-sh-t/43421/27 "2008-02-15T21:19:03Z")
I can’t believe the number of ignorant people on here. Yes there have been cycles in Co2 and temperature on this planet, but scientist have proven that they have never been higher than what they are now. I don’t even know why I am bothering to get into it. ---
**Author:** ![BigRon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/58956e/32.png) [@BigRon](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BigRon)\ **Post date:** [February 22, 2008, 1:01pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bob-lutz-global-warming-a-total-crock-of-sh-t/43421/28 "2008-02-22T13:01:48Z")
More talking from Lutz As part of a campaign against higher fuel economy standards, Lutz wrote in a 2006 blog posting that forcing automakers to sell smaller cars would be “like trying to address the obesity problem in this country by forcing clothing manufacturers to sell smaller, tighter sizes.” > **[GM exec stands by calling global warming a](https://www.reuters.com/article/environment-gm-globalwarming-dc/gm-exec-stands-by-calling-global-warming-a-crock-idINN2237297620080222?rpc=44)** > > General Motors Corp Vice Chairman Bob Lutz has defended remarks he made dismissing global warming as a "total crock of s---," saying his views had no bearing on GM's commitment to build environmentally friendly vehicles. [Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/bob-lutz-global-warming-a-total-crock-of-sh-t/43421.md?page=1)